>
There was no concern at the time. Amendments are not written to cover every imaginable concern. That is why SCOTUS reviews intent and meaning by inspecting the Congressional Record.
>
Ho, ha....that’s funny. SCOTUS reviewing the Congressional record.
Next you’ll be telling me they (re)read the (Anti)Federalist papers, let alone the Constitution, when it comes to the 2nd, or O’Care, or...
The confirmation of Justice Kavanaugh makes a huge impact.
Justices Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and their clerks and research staff will review everything according to the full historical meaning and intent.
Uh, sometimes they do. The legislative history often comes up both in oral arguments and is detailed in the decisions themselves.
Next you’ll be telling me they (re)read the (Anti)Federalist papers, let alone the Constitution, when it comes to the 2nd, or O’Care, or...
I've seen reference to both the Federalist Papers and Letters from a Federal Farmer in decisions.
Of course, you'd have to actually read them to discover this.