Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jurroppi1
it does not apply to children of non-citizens because they are not subject to our jurisdiction/laws simply due to the fact that they are not here legally.

If they are not subject to our laws then how can we arrest them and deport them?

82 posted on 10/30/2018 4:17:12 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg

2 posts above the one to which I replied has the answer (#42).

You also got a sound answer right below your post to which I am replying now.


90 posted on 10/30/2018 4:27:11 AM PDT by jurroppi1 (The Left doesnÂ’t have ideas, it has cliches. H/T Flick Lives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: DoodleDawg

That is not the meaning of the phrase (subject to the jurisdiction...)

The following link goes to an article that contains quotes from the men who authored the phrase and the debates on the 14th Amendment.

http://www.cairco.org/issues/unconstitutionality-citizenship-birth-non-americans

Given the clear language used, by the men who wrote the 14th Amendment and the men who made it law, it seems (to me) that the Supreme Court would be very hard pressed to rule against ending the anchor baby fallacy.


365 posted on 10/30/2018 7:26:25 PM PDT by Tahts-a-dats-ago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson