Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg

That makes perfect sense. They were born here but subject to another nation’s jurisdiction. Thus, they weren’t given citizenship. They were not the equivalent of the stateless slaves under the complete jurisdiction of the U.S.


183 posted on 10/30/2018 6:08:10 AM PDT by Electric Graffiti (Jeff Sessions IS the insurance policy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]


To: Electric Graffiti
That makes perfect sense. They were born here but subject to another nation’s jurisdiction

So if Mexico applies for a writ of habeas corpus to free Kate Steinle's killer based on lack of jurisdiction, you're fine with that?

You think Mexico's attempts to do this in the Texas death penalty cases were correct, and the killers were wrongly executed?

If getting a lethal dose of pentobarbital by order of a US court is not being subject to US jurisdiction, I don't know what is.

193 posted on 10/30/2018 6:17:45 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

To: Electric Graffiti
They were born here but subject to another nation’s jurisdiction.

To be more specific, the United States deals with native Indians through treaties, which is how we deal with other foreign nations according to the Constitution.

-PJ

256 posted on 10/30/2018 7:43:15 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson