Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Replaying 2014? Democrats are doubling down on same two issues that got them destroyed in 2014
American Thinker ^ | 10/22/2018 | William Sullivan

Posted on 10/22/2018 12:32:51 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

With just over two weeks until the November midterm elections, Democrats have found themselves championing two specific issues in the run-up to the elections – amnesty for illegal aliens and federal regulation of health care.

This all has prompted me to wonder...does anyone remember that these were precisely the two central issues of the 2014 midterm elections?

Border security took center stage in the summer of 2014, as tens of thousands of unaccompanied minors were sent northward from Central America. Democrats were emboldened, then, by the perceived rightward shift of the Republican Party, as House majority leader Eric Cantor was ousted in the Virginia primary for his pro-amnesty position. Even Brit Hume was prompted to observe that "Republicans will go forward into the 2016 election without their name associated with immigration reform which will make it very difficult for any Republican to become president."

That observation hasn't aged well, given that Donald Trump, now sitting in the Oval Office, largely centered his campaign on border security and against any form of blanket amnesty. Ann Coulter wrote an entire book about it.

And Obamacare was also the hot topic of the day in 2014, if you'll remember, as Democrats rallied the troops around thwarting a potential Republican Congress, which would destroy Barack Obama's landmark achievement. The problem was that Obamacare was wildly unpopular, as Obama's promise that "you could keep your doctor" contrasted poorly with Americans' experience. By the millions, they lost their health insurance plans, only to be left with the costly (and incredibly limited) Obamacare health insurance plans. Those who "kept" their policies and their doctors faced skyrocketing premiums, and none was too happy about it.

In case you don't remember how that 2014 strategy worked out for Democrats, here's a refresher.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2014; elections; midterms
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 10/22/2018 12:32:51 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m sure they have other, more compelling issues that they’re holding in reserve for 2020.


2 posted on 10/22/2018 12:34:29 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

THE BOTTOM LINE


3 posted on 10/22/2018 12:37:00 PM PDT by SeekAndFind (look at Michigan, it will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There you go! That’s it!


4 posted on 10/22/2018 12:39:26 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
"Even Brit Hume was prompted to observe that "Republicans will go forward into the 2016 election without their name associated with immigration reform which will make it very difficult for any Republican to become president.""

Which is one of many similar reasons I don't put a lot of stock in what Brit Hume says.

5 posted on 10/22/2018 12:40:00 PM PDT by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The Dems should ditch the donk and make the lemming their party’s mascot.


6 posted on 10/22/2018 12:40:46 PM PDT by mewzilla (Has the FBI been spying on members of Congress?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The article title:

Replaying 2014? Democrats are doubling down on same two issues that got them destroyed in 2014

The article is certainly worth reading, however, the title sums it up nicely.

SeekAndFind...thanks for posting.

7 posted on 10/22/2018 12:41:44 PM PDT by FtrPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Shows what the Britt Hume types think. He had it 180 degrees backward.


8 posted on 10/22/2018 12:43:15 PM PDT by Bullish (I'm not going to say "I told you so" about FaceBook... I'm just going to put it in my tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This time the Democrats are not running on Obamacare per se. They’re running on pre-existing coverage and while Obamacare as a whole may not be universally popular the pre-existing coverage part of it is. If their lawsuit manages to strike down Obamacare as unconstitutional then the pre-existing requirement is gone with it. The GOP has nothing to replace it with. And healthcare consistently polls at or near the top of voter concerns.


9 posted on 10/22/2018 12:47:55 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tench_Coxe
Which is one of many similar reasons I don't put a lot of stock in what Brit Hume says.

If he didn't say it he wouldn't get invited to any parties.

10 posted on 10/22/2018 12:51:37 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

as House majority leader Eric Cantor was ousted in the Virginia primary for his pro-amnesty position.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

If my fellow 7th VA voters and I had not Cantorized the weasel Eric Cantor they were planning to pass Rubio’s amnesty the very next day using mostly Democrat votes.

We would have already lost our country.


11 posted on 10/22/2018 12:53:49 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents__Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Even Brit Hume was prompted to observe that “Republicans will go forward into the 2016 election without their name associated with immigration reform which will make it very difficult for any Republican to become president.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The plan had been to pass Rubio’s Gang of Amnesty and take the issue off the table for Yeb!


12 posted on 10/22/2018 12:55:36 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents__Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Democrats need to dump the Clintons and Obama and their Socialist idealigogs and go back to their roots. Need good ideas that will bring back their base—LIKE
1. Reparations for all Black people of $10,000 each! People with less black DNA $5,000! That would get votes!
2. All Mexican Citizens residing in USA get to Vote!
3. Minimum Wage (a working wage) $20 an hour!
4. Free Computers for all Americans!
5. Rename Washington DC RosaParksville! or Obamastan.
6. Redesign the American Flag with rainbow stripes and a face of Obama in the field.
7. Free College indoctrination for all students (if they like it or not)


13 posted on 10/22/2018 12:56:15 PM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll Onward! Ride to the sound of the guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
From the article: " as Obama's promise that "you could keep your doctor" contrasted poorly with Americans' experience."

That's one way to put it.

Another way is that his promise was a bald-faced lie, repeated over and over again until no one could forget it.

14 posted on 10/22/2018 12:57:20 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

One of the reasons that Obamacare was an unmitigated failure was how they implemented pre existing conditions. Under Obamacare, you could buy your medical insurance when you needed it, as they were wheeling you into the ER on a gurney. This drove the price of health insurance through the roof. In order to offer no pre existing conditions, you have to spread the risk to everyone and everyone has to carry coverage as you must do with automobile insurance.


15 posted on 10/22/2018 1:05:59 PM PDT by centurion316 (1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

To me the healthcare is the most insidious. They are running commercials that are to a tee based on the democrat strategy of relying on amnesia.

If one were to watch the commercials regarding healthcare, one would suppose that the made up issue of no longer covering pre-existing conditions was the only thing wrong with our system. It is as if Obamacare isn’t skyrocketing premiums and limiting care.

I know, I know, the GOP failed to fix Obamacare. But that is a gripe of their own voters. The dems are running the campaign as if everyone loves it and loathes the GOP for trying to get rid of it.

It isn’t as sexy as the invasion approaching our borders right now, but I think the GOP needs to run a few adverts reminding the voters that it is called OBAMACARE and not one Republican voted for it.


16 posted on 10/22/2018 1:14:58 PM PDT by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

That was one hell of a storm of indignation we whipped up against Cantor. A model for what Trump did nationally IMO.

One forgotten outcome of the race was successfully pressuring Cantor to let the Benghazi Commission move forward, which is how we ended up finding Hillary’s secret server.

Only reason we were able to do that was that Cantor was already in full panic mode after losing control of his home county to the grassroots revolt.

If you haven’t seen this you will probably find it quite interesting: https://web.archive.org/web/20140618193106/http://thebullelephant.com/real-story-eric-cantors-downfall/


17 posted on 10/22/2018 1:17:53 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Number of arrested coup conspirators to date: 2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: centurion316
Under Obamacare, you could buy your medical insurance when you needed it, as they were wheeling you into the ER on a gurney. This drove the price of health insurance through the roof. In order to offer no pre existing conditions, you have to spread the risk to everyone and everyone has to carry coverage as you must do with automobile insurance.

That's not a pre-existing condition as defined by the insurance industry. If you have cancer and lose your health insurance and have to find a replacement, the new company can refuse to cover your cancer costs because they had been diagnosed before you asked them to cover the costs. That's what most people think about when they talk about pre-existing condition coverage and that's what scares the heck out of people.

18 posted on 10/22/2018 3:42:33 PM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Three issues; they left out gun control.


19 posted on 10/22/2018 3:45:25 PM PDT by Hugin ("Not one step from his weapons should a traveler take"...Havamal 38)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
That's not a pre-existing condition as defined by the insurance industry

Oh, so does the government agree with the industry industry definition?

20 posted on 10/22/2018 4:21:33 PM PDT by centurion316 (1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson