Think of Google, Twitter and FakeBook as the AP on steroids. They say they do not provide “content,” yet they provide the only platform (it’s really not arguable) and censor content based on an agenda.
They are not free enterprise, nor free speech; together, they confound and corrupt the legal system by making opposing claims simultaneously. You could argue that the (monopolies) platforms are content-agnostic or you can argue the monopolies can “produce” or limit speech. You cannot reasonably argue both. These monopolies should have the same restrictions and liabilities as any other media company, or they should not be able to restrict or moderate speech beyond law.
The current operation of these monopolies, in concert with corrupt (or naive, if you prefer) political oversight, truly represents an existential threat to our way of life.
Agree. And the POLs are corrupt, most are not naive.
Have a good evening.