Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Snapshot: Majority in U.S. Now Oppose Ban on Assault Rifles
Gallup ^ | October 19, 2018 | Megan Brenan

Posted on 10/19/2018 1:08:51 PM PDT by C19fan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: familyop

“57% oppose banning semi-automatic guns; 40% favor a ban
Opposition is up after 2017 reading in wake of Las Vegas shooting
Democrats more than twice as likely as Republicans to favor ban, 56% to 25%”


I’m pretty sure that these topics weren’t in the poll, but I know the answers anyway:

Percentage of semi-auto rifle owners who favor a ban: 0.00%

Percentage of semi-auto rifle owners who would not comply with a ban, even if one somehow passed the scrutiny of the Supreme Court as not being in violation of the 2nd Amendment: 100.00%

Percentage of semi-auto rifle owners who would shoot every ninja-clad SOB trying to enter his or her home to take their semi-auto rifles, but who shot their dogs and rifle-butted their pregnant wives in the belly first: 3,000% *

*Represents the average response of “I’d empty a full 30-round mag into every one of the SOBs!”


21 posted on 10/19/2018 2:23:45 PM PDT by Ancesthntr ("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt, The Weapons Shops of Isher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BBQToadRibs
Just as long as they don’t ban my Daisy one pump spring-loaded assault BB gun.

Sorry but they received the MAGA upgrade ; )

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

22 posted on 10/19/2018 2:25:11 PM PDT by broken_clock (Go Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

This is why they can’t be honest about what they stand for.

The Dems already knew this was tracking against them despite all the $$ spent to influence public opinion otherwise.


23 posted on 10/19/2018 2:52:27 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BBQToadRibs

Dual fully automatic BB mayhem.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Bw_-qAY_wlk


24 posted on 10/19/2018 4:18:50 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: C19fan; All
Actually, a typical AR is a “.22.” 😁

Seriously, I dare say outside of soldiers and Marines, very few people have ever seen an “assault weapon.”

25 posted on 10/19/2018 5:56:21 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isnÂ’t common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64
Seriously, I dare say outside of soldiers and Marines, very few people have ever seen an “assault weapon.”

Here's what I think of when somebody says "assault weapon" ... and I carried this hog for three years in the mid-70s ...


26 posted on 10/19/2018 6:08:18 PM PDT by BlueLancer (It is terrible to contemplate how few politicians are hanged. (G.K. Chesterton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Need to redefine it to being a weapon with a bayonet attached (if the bayonet is removed, it becomes a regular weapon and the bayonet is just another tool/utensil like they supply at steak restaurants)...


27 posted on 10/20/2018 2:27:53 AM PDT by trebb (Those who don't donate anything tend to be empty gasbags...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

“...outside of soldiers and Marines, very few people have ever seen an ‘assault weapon.’ “ [Cobra64, post 25]

No one in the military has seen an “assault weapon” either, because they don’t exist. There is no formal, rigorous, legally vetted definition.

The term was invented by the politicians, anti-gun activists, and media in the 1990s, to confuse the public into supporting the “Assault Weapon” Ban legislation.

Some segments of the trade use the term as jargon. Vexingly, DBI Books, then publisher of the annual Gun Digest, used to publish an occasionally-updated compendium of articles they called “Assault Weapons.” It dealt with military & law enforcement firearms: submachine guns, machine guns light & heavy, combat/self-defense handguns, tactical shotguns and the like.

“Assault rifle” has a formal definition approved by DoD, or used to: select fire, magazine-fed, closed bolt, operated by one person, chambering a cartridge of less power than standard-issue rifles. Ever since the USSR adopted the AK-47 and variants, and the United States declared the M16 family to be US standard rifle, that definition has become more problematic.


28 posted on 10/20/2018 11:17:24 AM PDT by schurmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

“...A Class III license and FBI background check are required...” [Lurkinandloomin, post 6]

In a legal/regulatory sense, there is no “Class III” Federal Firearms License. And federal law does not require a purchaser of machine guns or other NFA-regulated devices like sound suppressors to obtain any FFL before purchasing such.

A license holder with a valid FFL (one of 11 types) must pay yet more money to obtain a Special Occupational Taxpayer stamp (one of three classes) to get approved to manufacture, import, or deal in NFA-registerable devices.

A citizen wishing to purchase a machine gun (or suppressor, etc) gets one-time approval by filling out ATF Form 4, submitting it with a photo & fingerprints, and obtain written approval from the individual’s local Chief Law Enforcement Official - and paying the applicable fee ($200.00 for machine guns and suppressors) to BATFE. The bureaucrats there mull it over, then grant approval (or not).

It’s a one-time requirement and no renewals are needed, unlike an FFL. Approved owners of NFA-registered devices must notify ATF if they move, to keep the agency current on location of registered devices.

Transport of a registered device across state lines must be approved beforehand by the agency. The applies to device owners who travel to another state for organized vents like machine gun shoots.

Local and state laws may be more restrictive.


29 posted on 10/20/2018 11:47:36 AM PDT by schurmann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson