Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam

Big whoop. Nothing will come of this.


6 posted on 10/17/2018 10:39:13 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Every time a lefty cries "racism", a Trump voter gets his wings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jeff Chandler
It's like we here the clock tick-tocking over

and over again but it never goes off!


18 posted on 10/18/2018 12:08:27 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Chandler
It's like we here the clock tick-tocking over

and over again but it never goes off!


19 posted on 10/18/2018 12:08:28 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: All
Oct 05, 2016
Chairmen Question DOJ on Agreement to Limit Investigation of Secretary Clinton’s Private Server
Newly uncovered letters raise concerns that DOJ agreed to substantial and inappropriate limitations on the scope of its investigation

WASHINGTON, D.C. – House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chair Jason Chaffetz (R-UT), Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Chuck Grassley (R-IA), House Judiciary Committee Chair Bob Goodlatte (R-VA), and House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes (R-CA) sent a letter to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) requesting information on the unusual restrictions placed on the FBI in its criminal investigation of Secretary Clinton’s private email server.

The restrictions were discovered in the course of the Committees’ review of the immunity agreements for former Clinton staffers Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson. Key excerpts from the letter:

"We write to express our concerns about the process by which Congress was allowed to view the Wilkinson letters, that the letters inappropriately restrict the scope of the FBI’s investigation, and that the FBI inexplicably agreed to destroy the laptops knowing that the contents were the subject of Congressional subpoenas and preservation letters. “These limitations would necessarily have excluded, for example, any emails from Cheryl Mills to Paul Combetta in late 2014 or early 2015 directing the destruction or concealment of federal records. Similarly, these limitations would have excluded any email sent or received by Secretary Clinton if it was not sent or received by one of the four email addresses listed, or the email address was altered.

“Further, the Wilkinson letters memorialized the FBI’s agreement to destroy the laptops. This is simply astonishing given the likelihood that evidence on the laptops would be of interest to congressional investigators. “The Wilkinson letters raise serious questions about why DOJ would consent to such substantial limitations on the scope of its investigation, and how Director Comey’s statements on the scope of the investigation comport with the reality of what the FBI was permitted to investigate.”

Full text of the letter below.

30 posted on 10/18/2018 2:18:39 AM PDT by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Chandler

I don’t know. Lamberth has a strong reputation in Washington DC. This is one more bit of unraveling of the whole Clinton cabal.Cheryl Mills is one of Hillary’s more sinister flying monkeys. If they nail her, it’s getting pretty close to the Chappaqua Medusa herself.


34 posted on 10/18/2018 2:33:58 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Chandler
Yeah.

James O'Keefe and Dinesh need to do documentaries about this, the Russian Hoax, Benghazi...

89 posted on 10/18/2018 8:22:30 AM PDT by Eagles6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson