Posted on 10/15/2018 1:36:19 AM PDT by familyop
MCCARTHY: Just think the three individuals who are funding the Democratic Party, George Soros, you’ve got Michael Bloomberg, it’s not just $80 million into the House, he put another $20 million to try to win the Senate, then Tom Steyer, more than a $120 million he’s spent trying to win. His win goal is to try to impeach President Trump. He brags that his impeachment list is bigger than the NRA list. Those three individuals are trying to buy our government in this process.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
We don’t need no stinking billionaires.
;-)
I don’t think money or funding matters anymore on races. Between the ‘Trump-message’ and use of social media...this strategy of just paying the news media or networks to convey some message? It’s mostly just tossing money into a bottomless pit. If they wanted to take away the Trump enthusiasm....you’d have to come out and be totally aggressive on commerce and jobs...basically out-Trumping even Trump, and I just don’t see that happening.
What do Bloomberg, Soros and Steyer have in common? They are all Secular Progressive Jews whose view of America is nothing short of Stalinist! We should tell all three of them that America is “Not For Sale.” Something needs to be done about each and every one of them. Might want to throw in the bunch that runs Amazon, Facebook and Google too!
“I don’t think money or funding matters anymore on races. “
You need a serious intervention if you really believe what you wrote. Sadly, money does mean a lot in politics, too much in fact. We need to make it impossible for anyone to put $ 120 million into politics. Even a million is worrisome to me.
Steyer’s mother was an Episcopalian.
When the Rats buy ads they aren’t buying the ad as much as everything in between them...
If they are a billionaire, they are trying to buy the government. Forcing policies on people, through legislation, is a tried and true formula to new riches.
Interesting difference. He’s not leader (yet), but McCarthy is already doing more for Trump than Ryan ever did.
“Steyer’s mother was an Episcopalian.”
So here comes the “he’s really not Jewish” response because he was born out of a non-Jewish woman? So it’s o.k. that he does what he’s doing? Do Soros ( Schwartz) and Bloomberg get a pass too? What you are saying is a distinction without a difference. Maybe Steyer should just change his surname, and that will make what he’s doing oh so much more palatable to you!
Gee, are you finally catching on Kevin?
Your neo-Nazi rants are beside the point and off topic. Most Democrat politicians are not Jewish. Most billionaires are not Jewish. The political activities of the billionaires mentioned in the article have nothing to do with Judaism or genetics.
If you want to talk about correlations between socialist causes, cultures and surnames, try feminists and German surnames, tree worshipers and German surnames, animal worshipers and German surnames, cold, distant parents and German surnames,...something that more people can relate to.
Maybe it’s the Mongolian (Hun), Turkish, Arab or ancient East Indian that brings the left out in some billionaires. Hordes of several foreign nations swept through that part of Europe in the past (that and Rome). Ever think about that?
Just the kind of response I expected. Say what you will, but Jews in America have an inordinate amount of influence and a lot of it isn’t good for our country, I really liked the Nazi reference. It’s the card you pull out any time anyone points out the obvious. Blacks use the race card, you use the Nazi one! Have a nice day!
Although Steyer’s father (I believe) was Jewish his mother was christian and he was raised christian. You are correct about Soros and Bloomberg though.
Act Blue is spending over $800n in direct money where the max contribution amount is $5,400. They have almost the same amount in large contributions, the type you are talking about. The large money goes into issue ads (i.e. bashing Trump). The fact that Ossoff lost with all of their support means money isn't everything. The other problem is that the money will still get spent on dossiers, bribes, extortion, threats, payoffs to women, etc.
Just found this on Steyer’s wiki:
“In August 1986, he married Kathryn Ann Taylor. She is a graduate of Harvard College and earned a J.D./M.B.A. from Stanford University. The Rev. Richard Thayer, a Presbyterian minister, and Rabbi Charles Familant performed the ceremony.”
So evidently, irrespective of his mother’s Christian roots, Steyer does subscribe to Judaism it would seem, although the Christian participant here is Presbyterian and not Episcopalian.
“The fact that Ossoff lost with all of their support means money isn’t everything. “
Quite true! I don’t think that money will offset a poor candidate. In the case of Ossoff, I think he was a bit on the arrogant side, and I think he probably thought he could get away with the arrogance because of his superior funding. So if that were true, in his case, money might have been detrimental. And as you point out, money can be used in nefarious ways that don’t break campaign finance laws. I mean all the $hit that the RATs have brought down on Trump with the dossier, et al has been done with “soft money.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.