Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

If it wasn’t for global warming, Chicago would still be under a mile of ice.


2 posted on 10/14/2018 7:27:31 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BenLurkin

What I like to pose to climate change people is: what caused the last ice age and what caused its end?


4 posted on 10/14/2018 7:31:51 AM PDT by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

It is supposed to be under a mile of ice now, according to scientists in the 1970s, during the “Coming Ice Age” scare.


9 posted on 10/14/2018 7:34:14 AM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Chicago could be under a mile of ice...


If it were not a sanctuary city, Chicago’s illegal aliens could be under a mile of ICE.


12 posted on 10/14/2018 7:39:13 AM PDT by frank ballenger (End vote fraud,noncitizens & illegals voting & leftist media nes censorship or we're finished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin; Kaslin
"If it wasn’t for global warming, Chicago would still be under a mile of ice."

That is true, courtesy of Milankovitch cycles.

The absolutely rock-solid science of global warming is that extra CO2 in the atmosphere - which is largely from human activity - is causing some global warming. The crux of the matter is, "how much?". There is a huge difference between 3C by 2100, and 0.5C. It definitely seems to me that panic is not justified at this time. It is also mainstream scientific thought that the next Ice Age is now not going to happen, which would be a huge win for humanity and life as a whole.

I think market forces are going to drastically impact how much fossil fuel is burned going forward. In the meantime, I believe a push towards replacing coal-fired electric generation worldwide with nuclear generation is simple commonsense. Coal power has major downsides beyond producing CO2, namely pollution (particulates, mercury etc.), ash waste, and the environmental impact of coal mining.

The various companies working on small modular reactors (SMRs) have designs that are extremely safe, can be mass-produced, and in many cases don't require water cooling. They will provide electricity for less than ten cents per KWH, perhaps as cheap as three to five cents.

Each kilogram of nuclear fuel (uranium or thorium) provides as much energy as one million kilograms (one thousand tons) of coal. It is beyond foolish to not take advantage of such a cheap, plentiful source of clean, reliable power.

For unbiased information on global warming, I recommend Dr. Roy Spencer's site (http://drroyspencer.com). He is a non-alarmist atmospheric physicist, who's been labeled a "denier" by the alarmists - despite his agreement with the basic (undisputed) science of greenhouse gasses.

34 posted on 10/14/2018 8:17:30 AM PDT by PreciousLiberty (Make America Greater Than Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

“If it wasn’t for global warming, Chicago would still be under a mile of ice.”

As a conservative down stater I don’t have a problem with that.


56 posted on 10/14/2018 9:07:48 AM PDT by CrazyIvan (A gentleman arms himself for the protection of others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson