Posted on 10/05/2018 6:52:18 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
Author and conservative writer Victor Davis Hanson appeared on Laura Ingraham's FOX News show on Wednesday to weigh in on the Kavanaugh saga and explain how the story of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, who accused the Supreme Court nominee of sexual assault, is falling apart.
*snip*
Hanson responded to those who say Ford is incredibly believable:
VICTOR DAVIS HANSON: Coming into where we are today, she wasn't able to locate the supposed assault or the time or the date and she had the early 80s, the mid-80s, the late 80s, she was a young teenager, a little bit older. But I think there was a lot of doubt. Then we've had the collapse of the 5th accuser, 6th, 4th, 3rd, 2nd -- [Julie] Swetnick, [Deborah] Ramirez - that didn't help. And now we have the boyfriend coming forward and her own testimonies where she admitted that she flies regularly, that's corroborated by the boyfriend.*snip*
I think the tragedy though, Laura, I don't think she'd ever think she'd have to come forward at all. She would write this anonymous writ and then that would sort of float out and cast doubt and that might just panic the Republicans and Kavanaugh would withdraw.
It's sad because she gave one too many narratives. She gave a narrative to the therapist. She gave a narrative to Dianne Feinstein. She gave a narrative to 'The Washington Post.' She gave a narrative through her testimony. She butted up against a pretty seasoned prosecutor. And those narratives cannot be reconciled, they are mutually exclusive. They contradict each other. Whether it's on the lie detector or the circumstances about flying or particular names that are supposed to corroborate. Here we are, it's collapsed.
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
I would like to hear what Blasey-Ford’s REAL voice sounds like - not the phony, high-pitched 10 year-old wounded child’s voice she gave America during the hearings.
There’s a video at source with some extra information.
We have been asked to judge a situation based on the testimony of two people. Ford and the judge. Of the 10 or so relevant statements of Ford, most, 8 or so, have been proven false or have changed several times. This casts doubt on the her original statement about the assault event.
The judge’s statements have held up as consistent and unchallenged.
Fords Pal Monica McLean ,Deep State FBI rogue coached her into this Fraud it appears. Ford went on to screw it with various accounts, fear of flying, 2 doors, therapy notes, polygraph, fake witnesses, using the crazy baby doll voice....
Not just two people but the line of “witnesses” who have denied everything Ford has said.
I’m glad I’m not the only one who felt he voice was really strange and creepy!
She gave a narrative to Dianne Feinstein.
She gave a narrative to 'The Washington Post.'
She gave a narrative through her testimony.
She butted up against a pretty seasoned prosecutor.
And those narratives cannot be reconciled...
Perjury is a crime, right?
Cool, just recently started reading his articles but had never seen him on TV. Super smart individual. He’s right;
>>> “Are you for due process or are you for revolutionary fervor? Are you for reason or are you for emotion? Are you for this street antics that Antifa brought into the Senate or are you for custom and practice of the U.S. Congress?” <<<
This election is the Revolution vs the Constitution and “the issue is never the issue, the issue is always the revolution”.
In another month, we’ll begin to know which way this country is headed. Either we hold the line against socialist/communist revolution or it’s time to make some life changes to prepare for the coming times.
Her voice sounded like she was channeling Elmer Fudd.
Its the end for Guano Loca Ford
Adios...….
"You can be sincere, maybe, empathetic, but it has nothing to do with reason and logic and credibility. She wasn't credible and I think the fact that she was empathetic and sincere only gets you so far. In a weird way, Cory Booker was right when he said this doesn't matter anymore because we're into the realm not of legality anymore. It's not about Kavanaugh. It's not about Trump. It's about raw sheer politics in the arena.
And the Democrats are saying, you know what, we lost the Senate, we've lost the House, we've lost the presidency, we're going to lose the Supreme Court. We have no other trajectory to get this progressive agenda so we're going to bet the farm so to speak that we're going to use revolutionary tactics. And now this election is a referendum on whether you believe you can swarm a Senator or you can get in the face of a Senator in the elevator or bother somebody in a restaurant...
Are you for due process or are you for revolutionary fervor? Are you for reason or are you for emotion? Are you for this street antics that Antifa brought into the Senate or are you for custom and practice of the U.S. Congress?"
The answers you seek are in what she has earased and wiped from her history.
1. In 1978 The Grateful Dead came to DC And every teenager became a Dead Head. Her Year Book mentions many Rock Groups but strangely doesn’t mention the Grateful Dead.
2. She moves to Palo Alto where the GD originated.
3. She gets a $10,000 Go Fund Me donation from a GD Band Member.
I like the GD And went to the 1978 concert myself. I just find it strange it isn’t in her year book because locals know it was a huge influence in the 1970’s-80’s.
Yes. Someone post video of Dr Ford lecturing her class without the ‘voice fry’. It needs to be examined as evidence.
A pre-pubescent Elmer Fudd.
LOL!!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.