[Teacher317]

Since false allegations of sexual assault didn’t work, and the drinking habits as a college student didn’t work, and the “wrong temperament” line is failing, desperate Democrats are FINALLY trying to get substantive... and are failing miserably, of course... but we can now look forward to the “Judge Kavanaugh doesn’t respect the Right to Privacy” line. There’s just one little problem there...

The main 4th Amendment case that Liberals are now squawking about is Klayman v Obama... where Kavanaugh sided with Obama on bulk data collection.

Get that? Liberals are screaming that Kavanaugh cannot be trusted on privacy... because he sided with OBAMA!!!

Kavanaugh’s other main 4th Amendment cases:
NFFE (union) v Vilsack (random drug testing of US Forestry employees)
US v Askew (unzipping a jacket during a frisk)

I’m not sure that either of these is a monumental reason to pretend that he should not be allowed on the Bench. Many people support random drug testing, ESPECIALLY of Federal employees... and police unzipping a jacket during a weapons search does not seem to be an unreasonable rights violation to most people.

What’s next, Libs?

[NKP_Vet]

Murkowski just voted NO,Her career is over.