Posted on 10/01/2018 11:32:59 AM PDT by ButThreeLeftsDo
A lawyer investigating a woman's claim that she was physically abused by Minnesota Rep. Keith Ellison has concluded the allegation is unsubstantiated.
The Associated Press on Monday obtained a draft of the report by Susan Ellingstad, an attorney hired by Minnesota's Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party to investigate the allegation .
(Excerpt) Read more at kstp.com ...
Butt, butt, butt . . .
ALL women are to be BELIEVED
Reminds me of the Martha Moxley murder,something I've done some research on (too much free time,I guess).The police first suspected one of the Skakel sons,who admitted having been with the girl on the evening she was killed.In order to clear him the father hired a NYC Private Investigator to get the "facts".
Turns out that they concluded that another son,not the original suspect,did it.At that point the father shut the thing down...but the report was leaked to the press.
According to Democrat standards, if she makes the allegation its true and hes guilty.
Michael Skakel’s conviction was recently vacated. What do you think about this recent recycling of an old theory?
https://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=124793&page=1
Well, except for the bruising and the police report...
When will the #MeToo impeachment chants commence?
It’s okay in his religion and we have to respect it. /s
A lot of folks don’t realize a Muslim can rape and beat his wife anytime he wishes and can divorce her just a easy. I think that alone is why so many American women want to become Islam slaves.
I thought that was of a different woman.
I thought that was of a different woman.
Yup,I knew that.I was at the hearing a few years ago in Connecticut where he was seeking a new trial. I got to meet Mrs Moxley briefly.A very nice lady.And I was there on the day when he testified under oath.I heard him accuse the live-in "tutor",I heard him blame "two black guys" and I heard him blame his own brother.I kid you not.
If it turns out he doesn't go back to prison at least he got more time than OJ.
“I thought that was of a different woman.” (picture in post #29)
Oh my God, you are right.
I saw it presented as her when I searched for an image, but after you told me, I double checked.
I’ll ask the moderators to remove it.
“I thought that was of a different woman.” (picture in post #29)
Oh my God, you are right.
I saw it presented as her when I searched for an image, but after you told me, I double checked.
I’ll ask the moderators to remove it.
That investigation took, what, a week?
I’m questioning if an investigation occurred at all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.