Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

It's good that she pointed this out.

There is just an accusation, no proof.

1 posted on 09/30/2018 11:46:24 PM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Innovative

if it didn’t happen, why should it affect his job application?

“this isn’t a trial”

the media and Democrat Senators have echoed that claim.

“what difference does it make at this time anyhow”

they love their “fake but accurate” “seriousness of the charges”

no one should be denied such a seat because of a partisan smear campaign


2 posted on 09/30/2018 11:49:36 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Rachel Mitchell pointed out the lack of proof for Ford’s claims and the FBI will report the same thing.

We knew everything about Kavanaugh before her allegation was made public, it still wouldn’t change the fact its not even a crime for which he could be prosecuted today.

Do we really want to hold a juvenile offense over a grown man’s head for his entire life? Reasonable people would say “no”.

The Senate should follow suit and vote accordingly.


6 posted on 10/01/2018 2:22:10 AM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Here's the entire memo in PDF format for anyone interested in having it:

Rachel Mitchell Memo re Kavanaugh.pdf

9 posted on 10/01/2018 3:44:09 AM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

"B..b...but those mean women in the elevator scared me! They convinced me we need to investigate!"


10 posted on 10/01/2018 3:56:46 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Marxism: Trendy theory, wrong species)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Interesting isn’t it that this report only went to Republicans?
Why don’t the Democrats want to hear from a Woman who has 25 years in these cases, tell them you could not even get a warrant,let alone never get in a courtroom with this bunch of inconsistencies.
But of course our esteemed Senate Chambers are so much more exalted than a courtroom,filled with all the honorable individuals elected by an informed public.
I’m sure this report will be front page news be featured on CNN,MSNBC,ABC,CBS,NBC.


11 posted on 10/01/2018 4:01:37 AM PDT by ballplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Doesn’t matter. Flake will likely vote NO. For him this is all about Trump.


12 posted on 10/01/2018 4:06:18 AM PDT by BlueStateRightist (Government is best which governs least.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative; All

Here’s the complete NINE page pdf of Rachel Mitchell’s analysis of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s Allegations. Linked from Mark Levin’s twitter feed.

Clean and much easier to read.

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4952137/Rachel-Mitchell-s-analysis.pdf


15 posted on 10/01/2018 9:21:48 AM PDT by cpforlife.org (Abortion is the Choice of Satan, the father of lies and a MURDERER from the beginning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
Mitchell redeems herself here, with a thorough analysis of the matters she discussed with Ford.

Still, I maintain that a competent defense attorney could have destroyed Ford's credibility without her even knowing what was happening. No shouting, no theatrics would have been necessary. Just careful, calm questioning.

For example, in Ford's opening statement she claims the party she attended “was like many that summer....” Many!!!!! Why wasn't she grilled on this???

Ford also says that as to Kavanaugh “we did not know each other well....” Well lady, just how well did you know him!?! Again, this was never pursued.

16 posted on 10/01/2018 9:33:18 AM PDT by mojito (Zero, our Nero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

“Mitchell cites inconsistencies in Ford’s statements to the committee...”

Case closed.


17 posted on 10/01/2018 10:12:06 AM PDT by Amish with an attitude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Dems will find many unreasonable prosecutors to write a letter saying it is a slam dunk case.


18 posted on 10/01/2018 10:55:08 AM PDT by pas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson