Posted on 09/30/2018 6:53:30 PM PDT by Kevin in California
According to Fox News:
The sex-crimes prosecutor Republicans hired to question Brett Kavanaugh and accuser Christine Blasey Ford at Thursday’s hearing told senators the case would not hold up in a courtroom, sources told Fox News—guidance that could prove critical as wavering lawmakers prepare to vote.
Old news
That’s an understatement. It wouldn’t hold up in the National Enquirer. Maybe Mad magazine.
PS: How’s the blog going? ;-)
But they sure as hell better find out why Mrs. Ford had a second door installed and multiple residents that the postal worker found out! Something smells especially if it involved google interns staying there and helping her scrub all her social media! Let’s get a TIMELINE on HER activities shall we?
This was reported several days ago.
“Great news”?! I’ll believe it when I see it.
... told senators the case would not hold up in a courtroom...
Shame we’re not in a courtroom. Rules of evidence don’t apply in a street fight.
Kevin in California - if you’re the Kevin Jackson posted here, just wanted to say sorry that you got bumped from Fox.
You posted to yourself? Thank you humblegunner.:)
You can sleep well tonight...
Same thing she told them Friday. You just wake up from the weekend ?
“Shame we’re not in a courtroom. Rules of evidence don’t apply in a street fight.”
Exactly.
Indeed. But many Democrats live and flop around aimlessly by the appearance of facts and emotional bias. Just as a matter of the law this was dead decades ago, but persecution as different from prosecution as not keeping your word about keeping a source anonymous is from keeping your word,
And the DNC is full of people who look at power, their power, as the only faith they really value.
Yah,and that’s gonna sway a single Rat or a single Never Trupmer?
LOL
THIS IS A VANITY POST and not a very good one. Please make your clickbait somewhere else.
what an utter lack of timeliness and insight. It is old news and irrelevant. The fact that the FBI could not find prosecutable evidence is meaningless.
Repressed memories, brought to light through hypnosis, caused the McMartin scandal. All those who “came forward” were proven to have “implanted memories” that were never true. So she is right, this will never er make it into a courtroom
The City of Palo Alto Building Codes required the 2nd door installation during the remodel due to what she was needing to do with the building:
Ford testified that the “trauma” from her alleged assault was the reason why she argued with her husband to install two front doors during their extensive remodel. Ford and her husband purchased their home in Palo Alto in June 2007. In November, 2007, they obtained a permit from the City of Palo Alto (permit #07000-00000-02866) for “735 S.F. ADDITION TO INCLUDE NEW BEDROOM & BATH. REMODEL LIVING ROOM & KITCHEN”. This permit was finished/finalized in February 2010. During the hearing she said she was either renting out a part of the home as an AirBnb and/or was renting out a part of the home to Google employees. Ford’s property is zoned R1-7000S, which does allow for either detached or attached accessory dwelling units or junior accessory dwelling units that can be rented out for periods no less than 30 days at a time. It also allows for space within an existing single family home to be treated as an accessory dwelling unit . In order to do that, the City of Palo Alto Municipal Zoning Code 18.42.040 Section 5 specifically states, ” an Accessory Dwelling Unit shall be permitted if the unit is contained within the existing space of a single-family residence or an existing accessory structure, HAS INDEPENDENT EXTERIOR ACCESS FROM THE EXISTING RESIDENCE…” etc.
IOW, two separate exterior doors were LEGALLY REQUIRED by the City of Palo Alto in order for her to rent out a portion of her home. This blows out her testimony that she was so traumatized by her alleged assault that she was compelled to put in two doors.
You didn’t need a law degree to see that.
Her story would not hold up to scrutiny by a grade school debating club.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.