Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: StAnDeliver

My question is why are there so few images of Christine Blasey-Ford on the web? Being the Lefty she is, you would expect photos of her in every women’s lib rally giving Trump the middle finger. Methinks there has been a good scrubbing—something these women’s libbers should be doing on their kitchen floor.


21 posted on 09/29/2018 4:03:31 PM PDT by jonrick46 (Cultural Marxism is the cult of the Left waiting for the Mothership.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: jonrick46
My question is why are there so few images of Christine Blasey-Ford on the web?

Because she and her democrat handlers spent weeks scrubbing her from the web before "leaking" her claim.

24 posted on 09/29/2018 4:07:46 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation has ended!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: jonrick46

As a college prof, one would think there would be lectures, presentations and workshops of her on youtube. Nope. Not a one. Wiped clean with a cloth.

Her strained family situation may be the answer to why she got a hotel room for her granny’s funeral rather than sleep in her old room at home. It’s my understanding she’s been in the DC/Delaware/Maryland area without Mr. Ford since the kids are still in school. IIRC, it was Mr. Ford who mentioned getting security for the boys either at school or driving them. Maybe someone can set up a gofundme for that, huh.


33 posted on 09/29/2018 4:17:18 PM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: jonrick46

Her social media was scrubbed.


42 posted on 09/29/2018 4:31:56 PM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: jonrick46

…”why are there so few images of CBF on the web?”

Maybe because that person who ‘testified’ at the hearing wasn’t Christine Blasey-Ford. Therefore the persons who wanted to use her testimony to sink Judge Kavanaugh’s appointment removed almost all the pictures of the ‘real’ Dr. Ford, so they could bring in that ringer when CBF refused to come forward to repeat the allegation in the letter(s) in public and under oath. Remember, the first letter supposedly said that the writer wanted to remain anonymous. The person who did testify looked 20 years older than CBF; “she” looked like a man in a wig and in drag. That person spoke in an artificially falsetto, ‘little girl’ voice, and seemed to throw around technical jargon without understanding it, while showing limitations in vocabulary and grammar one would not expect from a person with advanced degrees. So maybe CBF’s pictures have been removed so that the Committee members and the public wouldn’t realize the she did not come forward in public, that as she was quoted as repeatedly saying that she never intended to come out publicly, and that her attorneys brought out an imposter to read the script they had written for her; maybe the imposter was not even a woman, but a female impersonator.

Well, it could be so. ;-) Prove that it isn’t. s/


62 posted on 09/29/2018 6:40:24 PM PDT by VietVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson