Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nwrep
Republicans are not even fielding a contestant in 39 out of the 435 seats

Why is that I wonder. Are any of those in places like Kali where the two most populous primary candidates go to the general, regardless of party?

7 posted on 09/26/2018 6:17:14 AM PDT by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Magnum44

Most likely because no politician wants a loss on their record by running in a non-winnable district.


10 posted on 09/26/2018 6:26:51 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death by cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Magnum44; nwrep

Were those 39 held by democrats previously?


13 posted on 09/26/2018 6:31:24 AM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Magnum44

Are any of those in places like Kali

*************

Seven are in California....

But there’s another side to that coin. None of the seven California challengers
has ever held an elected public office—none has been a city council member, county
supervisor, or school-board member, and few have run for office before—and several
have had trouble persuading voters that they’re intrinsic enough in their district to
represent it. Which is to say that most of the seven are new to this business—and, in
many cases, new to the voters.

https://www.thenation.com/article/can-california-democrats-flip-the-house-in-november/


27 posted on 09/26/2018 7:23:08 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson