The essence of this entire issue is that liberal want to establish the certain precedent that a woman’s testimony, years after the fact can convict a man of something sexual.
And completely absent any corroboration or other evidence, even the circumstantial.
They do not want to be held to even the standard they had to be in the same place at the same time.
No, the essence of this is that the Donks saw a dismal November coming, and have nothing to energize their crazed followers.
They thought it was going to be “United Uteruses”, at least that’s the card they’re trying to play.