The most astonishing thing about Ms. Ramirez's story is that, if any of it occurred, she is the perpetrator and the person, if any, who chose to expose themselves at the party is the victim. As crude as it might be, among adults at a party someone exposing themselves is not a crime. But Ms. Ramirez stated that she touched the genitals of the person who was nude. That act is a sexual assault, unless the person she touched consented to the contact.
Really? If it was anywhere but in his own room, it would count as indecent exposure in some states, a misdemeanor crime. It could be trouble for the exposer if the woman, a college freshman was a minor.
But Ms. Ramirez stated that she touched the genitals of the person who was nude. That act is a sexual assault, unless the person she touched consented to the contact.
I doubt a court would take that very seriously.