Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gregg Jarrett say Maryland has no Statute of Limitations on Sexual Assault
Fox Business ^ | September 21st, 2018 | Lou Dobbs

Posted on 09/22/2018 9:35:20 AM PDT by Mariner

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last
To: sitetest

If she had been a male, there wouldn’t even be an issue. They would have applauded Kav’s efforts and called the ‘victim’ homophobic.


41 posted on 09/22/2018 10:04:27 AM PDT by PrairieLady2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Dershowitz has said the events she claims do not fit Attempted Rape.

Interesting to know how the 1982 statute addresses activity between juveniles less than 2 years apart.

The absence of any subsequent claims or even rumors over the course of his very public life, including 6 FBI background checks should override this flimsy unprovable accusation of juvenile misbehavior.

Some worrying thought about the accuser.

Research psychologists know the risks of invalid data, why present a flimsy claim?
Although she is not a clinical psychologist, she attended and interned in a clinical program, she teaches in universities, she knows about claims there are therapeudic benefits in reporting.
She has to know the literature on witness identification problems and memory.
What has been her access to sexual assault victims and their claims?


42 posted on 09/22/2018 10:05:24 AM PDT by PsyCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

If the committee votes Monday, the DA or county attorney will file charges within 24 hours.

Bet on it.


43 posted on 09/22/2018 10:07:45 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Trumpisourlastchance

“This is insanity.”

In terms of the facts (not that there are any) or even the validity of making such an accusation this surely is insanity.

Unfortunately it is proving to be very effective political gamemanship, in large part because too many so-called Republicans don’t want an ethical constitutional judge seated either.

Look what Feinstein and Ford have accomplished with this little stunt. At the very least they have delayed Kavanaugh’s confirmation by a few weeks. It’s still possible that they have completely derailed it, and even prevented the restoration of a
constitutionally sound Supreme court. Who’s insane here?


44 posted on 09/22/2018 10:08:01 AM PDT by Junk Silver ("It's a little hard to herd people onto trains when they're shooting at you." SirLurkedalot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: PrairieLady2

PS...I used what I wrote as an exple. I don’t think Kav was guilty. He is innocent until proven guilty and that hasn’t happened...so he’s 100% innocent.


45 posted on 09/22/2018 10:08:42 AM PDT by PrairieLady2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Filing charges would require evidence, something completely lacking in this case. The last time a DA tried to ramrod a prosecution without evidence his name was Nifong and it was in Durham, NC. How did that turn out?


46 posted on 09/22/2018 10:13:04 AM PDT by centurion316 (Back from exile from 4/2016 until 4/2018.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: An.American.Expatriate

I agree. She should file a report with the local police and they will get right back to her.


47 posted on 09/22/2018 10:13:24 AM PDT by dgbrown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
It isn't provable today, but defamation clearly is provable today. (Also, discovery should be interesting!)
48 posted on 09/22/2018 10:14:34 AM PDT by Sooth2222 (Hanlon's Razor: "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Junk Silver

Look what Feinstein and Ford have accomplished with this little stunt.

*******************

And as a “bonus” they have managed to send a warning message to all future Republican nominees for the USSC.

Its all about intimidation.


49 posted on 09/22/2018 10:15:05 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

Filing charges would require evidence, something completely lacking in this case.

****************

This would be in Maryland so I wouldn’t bet good money on that.


50 posted on 09/22/2018 10:16:31 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

“RAPE”?

She isn’t claiming rape! What she is claiming is before foreplay.


51 posted on 09/22/2018 10:16:54 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PrairieLady2

i agree with you there!!!


52 posted on 09/22/2018 10:18:31 AM PDT by ronniesgal (I wonder what his FR handle is?????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Of course first of all Dr. Ford will have to provide far more specific details about the alleged attempted rape charge vs Brett Kavanaugh than she has provided so far. You can’t just put vague details in a criminal complaint, information provided must be as detailed and specific as possible!

Then she must sign the criminal complaint form, making a SWORN OATH that the information provided on the complaint form IS THE TRUTH -‘UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY!!

However, even if she does this, more than likely noting will come of it. Since the alleged crime occurred in 1982(?) there is likely NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE REMAINING. The only thing law enforcement will have to go on is eyewitness statements and a statement from the accused. Since every person Dr. Ford has mentioned as witnesses have either denied this crime ever took place or have no memory of it, along with Suspect Kavanaugh denying it, they’ll just collect the witness/suspect statements along with the complaint, place them in a file folder and file it away in a file cabinet for cold crime cases were it will remain until it gets archived!


53 posted on 09/22/2018 10:18:45 AM PDT by dsm69 (Boycott News Media/Hollywood Advertisers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

“She may have preserved her blue dress with semen stains?”

One piece swimsuit, not sure of the color.


54 posted on 09/22/2018 10:21:07 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: faucetman

We’re talking about no statute of limitations on sex assault in Maryland, which generally means ‘rape’. I didn’t write anything about this supposed incident.

I want to know how you prove rape before DNA sampling - say 70 years ago.


55 posted on 09/22/2018 10:21:09 AM PDT by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Teenagers acting the fool is not sexual assault.


56 posted on 09/22/2018 10:31:19 AM PDT by jch10 (The FBI has done more damage in the 2016 election than the Russians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Then file a claim...


57 posted on 09/22/2018 10:34:03 AM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZGw2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
Not that I think he's guilty, but this does bring up a question. If anything happened before statutes of limitations and penalties were changed, can a person be charged using the new laws?

"Future Crimes" was a sci-fi concept just a few years ago. Where that leads is chilling.

58 posted on 09/22/2018 10:34:48 AM PDT by grania
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

With no SOL, and not voting last Thursday, the GOP has created a situation where charges can be filed against Kavenaugh over the weekend.


59 posted on 09/22/2018 10:42:35 AM PDT by Chauncey Gardiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

Before this is all over they will have charged Kavanaugh with the murder of Jon Benet Ramsey.

THAT is how insane they are.


60 posted on 09/22/2018 10:56:19 AM PDT by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson