And Katie, you could have pointed out to the UASToday woman on the panel, that a poll said only 25% of women believe BlaseyFord.
Made up a magazine article about rapes that never occured.
Kavenaugh has been slandered. A grand jury should be impaneled to clear his name.
Yep. We should start a movement for men who have “survived” being falsely accused of sexual impropriety (Anthony Wiener and Harvey Weinstein need not apply). They can tell their heartbreaking tales of how their lives were ruined, their careers destroyed, their families traumatized, and their fragile spirits crushed all on the word of some booze-addled tramp or a Soros-chartered hooker.
When we start to prosecute them for lies and fabrication and send them to jail this will stop
I wasn’t there so can’t say who to believe. However, the one thing I do believe is she’s lying her skanky backside off and he hasn’t had a scandal for the last 36 years.
There is a vast conspiracy in place against judges such as Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh who stand for constitutional, limited, government. That hales back much further back in time than the vast right wing conspiracy . . . against my husband claim made by Hillary Clinton twenty years ago.Even by Ms. Ford's own telling, in the putative incident:
And the truth of the charges alleged by Ms. Ford against Judge Kavenaugh cannot actually matter.
- nobody was killed.
- the prestige of the US government was not compromised by the brutalizing and murder of a US ambassador.
- nobody spent a night in terror and fighting for their lives without support from their U.S. government employer.
- the incident putatively happened way back in the 1980s.
In that perspective, is Ms. Fords angst actually the only thing that matters?
- The US engaged in the Gulf War since then.
- 9/11/01 happened since then.
- The US has fought wars in Iraq and Afghanistan since then.
- No less than a third of the people who were alive in America then have died by now.
So the question for Senator Feinstein, is
- It will never be clear that the charges are true - and it will never be clear that they are false. The charge is too indefinite and witness-free. It asks Judge Kavenaugh to prove a negative. If the facts cant be known, what would it mean to suggest that the facts are important - or that they matter at all?
What difference, at this point, does it make?"
This "controversy" is based almost entirely upon the inability of Liberals to distinguish between "plausibility" and "provability" (i.e., "falsifiability").
If I agree to pay someone $1 million if he will awake at midnight, clap his hands together, and then go back to sleep, that person will not get the $1 million unless he can prove that he did it.
Even if it is entirely believable that he did it, his claim is nonetheless not verifiable (unless he, e.g., took video footage or had eyewitnesses ready to testify). His claim is thus without merit and should therefore be summarily dismissed.
Regards,
BTTT!!