Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/21/2018 3:56:53 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin

And Katie, you could have pointed out to the UASToday woman on the panel, that a poll said only 25% of women believe BlaseyFord.


2 posted on 09/21/2018 3:59:27 PM PDT by originalbuckeye ('In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act'- George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

3 posted on 09/21/2018 4:09:13 PM PDT by Architect of Avalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Sabrina Rubin, of Rolling Stone

Made up a magazine article about rapes that never occured.

4 posted on 09/21/2018 4:24:49 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Kavenaugh has been slandered. A grand jury should be impaneled to clear his name.


5 posted on 09/21/2018 4:43:36 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Yep. We should start a movement for men who have “survived” being falsely accused of sexual impropriety (Anthony Wiener and Harvey Weinstein need not apply). They can tell their heartbreaking tales of how their lives were ruined, their careers destroyed, their families traumatized, and their fragile spirits crushed all on the word of some booze-addled tramp or a Soros-chartered hooker.


6 posted on 09/21/2018 4:52:25 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

When we start to prosecute them for lies and fabrication and send them to jail this will stop


7 posted on 09/21/2018 5:09:57 PM PDT by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I wasn’t there so can’t say who to believe. However, the one thing I do believe is she’s lying her skanky backside off and he hasn’t had a scandal for the last 36 years.


8 posted on 09/21/2018 5:42:45 PM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Brett Kavanaugh’s problems would be over if only he had a Hillary Rodham type lawyer:
There is a vast conspiracy in place against judges such as Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh who stand for constitutional, limited, government. That hales back much further back in time than the “vast right wing conspiracy . . . against my husband” claim made by Hillary Clinton twenty years ago.

Even by Ms. Ford's own telling, in the putative incident:

And the truth of the charges alleged by Ms. Ford against Judge Kavenaugh cannot actually matter. So the question for Senator Feinstein, is

“What difference, at this point, does it make?"

10 posted on 09/21/2018 6:15:53 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (Journalism promotes itself - and promotes big government - by speaking ill of society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
The claims of both parties should be taken seriously, investigated and truthfulness determined on evidence.
This is an oversimplification. While being a vast improvement over the "he said / she said" crap so many pundits mouthed in the early going, it omits the procedural rules designed to protect the rights of the accused. The Judiciary Committee is being asked to adjudicate a crime. At the same time, Democrats are making all kinds of demands at variance with criminal procedure. On procedural grounds, Dr. Ford's complaint should be dismissed without even being heard. It's not timely. There is no coherent narrative of what was supposed to have happened. With all the absurd demands being made, it has all the appearance of a politically motivated smear of a kind we've seen before.
15 posted on 09/21/2018 11:42:51 PM PDT by AlienCrossfirePlayer (Lies are the tools politicians use to separate you from your freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
My take on this:

This "controversy" is based almost entirely upon the inability of Liberals to distinguish between "plausibility" and "provability" (i.e., "falsifiability").

If I agree to pay someone $1 million if he will awake at midnight, clap his hands together, and then go back to sleep, that person will not get the $1 million unless he can prove that he did it.

Even if it is entirely believable that he did it, his claim is nonetheless not verifiable (unless he, e.g., took video footage or had eyewitnesses ready to testify). His claim is thus without merit and should therefore be summarily dismissed.

Regards,

16 posted on 09/22/2018 12:55:41 AM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

BTTT!!


19 posted on 09/24/2018 11:12:44 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson