Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: detective

What is the source for what she told her therapist?
Not doubting your info, but just wondering where it can be found.


20 posted on 09/18/2018 9:22:37 AM PDT by milagro (There is no peace in appeasement!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: milagro

“What is the source for what she told her therapist?”

It is probably not all that uncommon for a therapist, right after a session, to upload their patient notes to the internet.


23 posted on 09/18/2018 9:25:50 AM PDT by Blue House Sue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: milagro

Even the WaPo corroborated portions of the story though they also noted Ford’s claim her therapist made mistakes in her notes


78 posted on 09/18/2018 10:24:17 AM PDT by MadLibDisease (Proudly residing in Dar-al-Harb since 1959)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: All

Christine Ford musta heard about testifying under oath before Congress.

WIKI-—Making false statements (18 U.S.C. § 1001) is the common name for the United States federal crime laid out in Section 1001 of Title 18 of the United States Code, which generally prohibits knowingly and willfully making false or fraudulent statements, or concealing information, in “any matter within the jurisdiction” of the federal government of the United States,[1] even by merely denying guilt when asked by a federal agent.[2]

A number of notable people have been convicted under the section, including Martha Stewart,[3] Rod Blagojevich,[4] Michael T. Flynn,[5] Rick Gates,[6] Scooter Libby,[7] Bernard Madoff,[8] and Jeffrey Skilling.[9]

This statute is used in many contexts. Most commonly, prosecutors use this statute to reach cover-up crimes such as perjury, false declarations, and obstruction of justice and government fraud cases.[10]

Its earliest progenitor was the False Claims Act of 1863. In 1934, the requirement of an intent to defraud was eliminated. This was to prosecute successfully, under the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933 (NIRA), the producers of “hot oil”, i.e. oil produced in violation of restrictions established by NIRA. In 1935, NIRA was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.

The statute spells out this purpose in subsection 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a), which states:

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—

(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device[ , ] a material fact;
(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry
shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331),[11] imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both....


86 posted on 09/18/2018 10:30:15 AM PDT by Liz ( Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: milagro

So why was she in therapy? Why is this incident relevant to her therapy? Is it marriage therapy and she is trying to ratioanalize her weird behavior? Does the therapist think she is nuts or a congenital liar? If the notes are to be used as proof, she opened the door. Let’s have at the rest of the notes.


113 posted on 09/18/2018 11:16:43 AM PDT by LoneRangerMassachusetts (Behind enemy lines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson