Posted on 09/16/2018 4:19:51 PM PDT by COUNTrecount
Transparent Political Hit Job – Kavanaugh Accuser, Christine Ford-Blasey, Activated To Advance 35-year-old Accusations…
Transparent Political Hit Job – Kavanaugh Accuser, Christine Ford-Blasey, Activated To Advance 35-year-old Accusations… Posted on September 16, 2018 by sundance
The timing is transparent: the week prior to Brett Kavanaugh committee vote; the outlet is transparent: the intelligence ‘resistance’ apparatus, The Washington Post; the accuser is transparent: a far-left California liberal professor, Christine Ford Blasey, anti-Trump ‘resistance activist’ with an anti-policy background, including recently. The accusation is transparent: 35-year-old harassment claim/accusation, from high school intended to activate the “Me Too” activists. The motive is transparent: block the Supreme Court nomination of Justice Kavanaugh.
Today the Washington Post announces the accuser of Brett Kavanaugh has stepped forward to tell her story.
Ms. Christine Ford, aka Christine Blasey, a registered democrat and political activist, claims she attended a high school party where Kavanaugh forcibly groped her over her clothes. [Story Here]
[…] While his friend watched, she said, Kavanaugh pinned her to a bed on her back and groped her over her clothes, grinding his body against hers and clumsily attempting to pull off her one-piece bathing suit and the clothing she wore over it. When she tried to scream, she said, he put his hand over her mouth.
“I thought he might inadvertently kill me,” said Ford, now a 51-year-old research psychologist in northern California. “He was trying to attack me and remove my clothing.”
Ford said she was able to escape when Kavanaugh’s friend and classmate at Georgetown Preparatory School, Mark Judge, jumped on top of them, sending all three tumbling. She said she ran from the room, briefly locked herself in a bathroom and then fled the house. (read more)
After carefully deleting her social media profile; and after carefully selecting left-wing attorney Debra Katz to represent her political interests; and after carefully scripting some dubious and sketchy supportive material including a lie-detector test and vague notes from a 2012 couples-therapy session, the 51-year-old academic psychologist steps forward.
JUST IN: Senate Judiciary Committee vote on Judge Kavanaugh's nomination will take place next Thursday as scheduled, despite last-minute accusation by left-wing activist
— Wired Sources (@WiredSources) September 16, 2018
Let’s see what the Dems do now. In order to stall the voting meeting on Thursday, they will need to make Christine Blasey Ford available to testify. You don’t get to play Anita Hill 2.0 if you don’t play the whole part, Ms Ford. #KavanaughConfirmation
— JohnWickofPolitics (@Gingrich_of_PA) September 16, 2018
If you can’t testify under oath to it, it never happened. Welcome to America, the land of the free. Anonymous letters & mysterious contradictions don’t derail confirmations for SCOTUS. Let’s hear it under oath, w/ penalty of perjury hanging like the Sword of Damocles #Kavanaugh
— JohnWickofPolitics (@Gingrich_of_PA) September 16, 2018
very weird.
Perhaps, Brock Turner can provide more information on this incident.
You have to give the Democrats credit, they played this perfectly.
Diane kept quiet through the entire process, and even seemed to sympathize with BK last week, giving her accusations more power.
They clearly knew about this woman for months, but kept it quiet, while they collected whatever they could to prove it. The woman had some sort of lie-detector test done, by her own lawyer, and revealed a “truth” that could just be a “we had a statement that was true”, not necessarily saying that her details are true.
The did it anonymously, gave BK a chance to make a public statement, along with the other male accused, and then brought out the actual charges, but through a newspaper not under oath.
So if anything at all Brett or the other guy said missed ANY truth at all in what she said, their denials will be used as evidence of lying. If they had not spoken, then even if the entire thing were “true”, the argument would be about details, and recollections, and norms of behavior. Now the dems just need to show that BK was in a party with this woman, and even if BK argues there was a consensual act, his previous denial will be used against him.
Now, we presume that there are no people who will stand with this woman from the party, or they would have found those people. BUT, if someone says there is no others, maybe they DO have one other woman who is going to say that BK and this woman were at a party together.
SO hopefully the republicans will just keep quiet and not keep talking about the alleged incident. Better to wait until all the facts are out before saying anything.
Another key Republican member of the Judiciary Committee, Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah complained the accusations were unverified and said the judge had submitted to six FBI background checks over the last 25 years that included interviews with families, friends and acquaintances and never revealed any character issues.
If she is cross-examined and found to be lying, she must go to prison for perjury and treason.
Kavanaugh is being Bork’ed and Thomas’ed.
I understand from other sources that much of her on line history was scrubbed before DiFi came out with it, so as to hide her true colors.
“Kavanaugh Classmate Named in Letter Strongly Denies Allegations of Misconduct”
“Kavanaugh’s classmate said of the woman’s allegation, “I have no recollection of that.””
https://www.weeklystandard.com/john-mccormack/kavanaugh-classmate-named-in-letter-strongly-denies-allegations-of-misconduct
““It’s just absolutely nuts. I never saw Brett act that way,”” https://heavy.com/news/2018/09/mark-judge-brett-kavanaugh-classmate/
What did Kween Kamala know and when did she know it?
Ya mean the SCRUB MACHINES Goolag, Farcebook, and Twatter?
Of course she will testify, and she’s been working on this for months, so whether it is true or not, she’s going to sound convincing, even if also not having enough of any details.
We’ll probably have to have the other guy come and testify, and he wrote a book that is going to be scandalous if he gets asked too much about it, so he’s not going to be a great witness. And they’ll probably make BK testify again under oath.
A best case scenario would be either 1) they find another guy who admits to it, and then it looks like bad memory on her part, or 2) they find others at “the party” who can discount the story, which will be hard since we don’t even know what YEAR the party was, or where it was.
She can testify.
But she has to submit to a perjury investigation by the Special Counsel, since he’s been convicting Republicans left and right for lying to the FBI.
Fair?
She needs to shoot her vagina...
https://www.ktnv.com/news/crime/report-csn-professor-shoots-self-in-arm-to-protest-president-trump
McConnell is to blame this is what he set up for Judge Roy Moore.
I am waiting for Gloria Allred to appear.
It’s a huge paid for lie.
And if that is all a man his age had done when a teenager. .its certainly not enough to keep him off the sc. The gop had better step in and not stutter.
Then theres hillary and obama with real crimes to be held accountable.
We know it’s BS, Christine knows it’s BS, Heck her Mama knows its BS, but that is politics today.
You can get half the people to believe ANYTHING.
Why do I expect to see Gloria Allred somewhere in this story?
Is anyone surprised?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.