Considering that the tax decrease has increased revenue, shouldn’t they be able to pass it without that 10 year limitation?
RE: Considering that the tax decrease has increased revenue, shouldn’t they be able to pass it without that 10 year limitation?
Note that despite the increased revenue, the BUDGET DEFICIT remains at historic highs.
Unless we control spending (which went up EVEN FASTER than revenues), we will ALWAYS have to either print money or go into debt.