Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All

for openers we better do something to protect our satellites. Take out them out and we are SCREWED.


5 posted on 09/08/2018 2:27:54 PM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: gibsonguy

“for openers we better do something to protect our satellites.”

The ones my company worked on in the ‘80’s were designed to put the maximum amount of stuff in the smallest space with zero attempt beyond a self-darkening lens to protect the satellite. They need to be made like stealth aircraft with angled panels and zero protuberances and no solar cells. There are nuclear batteries but the ecology* nuts went crazy when they were scheduled for launch so I think NASA gave them up. They also need to be able to move in orbit so they can lose themselves in the clutter. All of these things, angled panels and moving ability, cut down on what they can carry and how capable they are. That’s why it isn’t done now because before about 10 years ago it wasn’t easy to disable them. Now, it’s a snap. So, we need lots more of slightly less capable nuclear powered satellites.

* Because they could crash.


12 posted on 09/08/2018 2:59:47 PM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson