Replies

Wait a minute. Has no one explained to her the foundation of her platform? If she thinks that her good looks, quick whit, high moral character and public speaking skills are the reason she gets media coverage for her “anti-bullying” platform, she is delusional.

She is the subject of an historical media cycle. Awards were won for the coverage of the saga she was at the center of. Her name will be in history books for generations. The history books are not going to remember her for her epoch contributions to stopping bullying. If she doesn’t have a canned answer for this simple question by now, she should go back to secretarial work and back out of the spotlight.

That all may be true. But if the media outlet believed the interview wouldn't be worthwhile unless those questions were asked, then it should not have agreed that such question were off limits, which they apparently did.

They made a specific deal with Lewinsky, then decided to break it. Regardless of her background, she had the same right as does anyone else to withdraw from a broken deal.