Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/31/2018 1:16:01 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: yesthatjallen

Its not a law so really the court system has nothing to review.


2 posted on 08/31/2018 1:17:30 PM PDT by Zathras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

W 2002 Judge appointee

https://www.fjc.gov/history/judges/hanen-andrew-s


3 posted on 08/31/2018 1:19:07 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
DACA is an Obama-era program that protected undocumented immigrants illegal aliens who came to the country as children from deportation.

Not immigrants.

8 posted on 08/31/2018 1:27:41 PM PDT by GregoTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Hanen’s a good guy.

Don’t know who dropped the procedural ball here.

Abbott may have been preoccupied.

But the stampede will start again.


10 posted on 08/31/2018 1:37:03 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
Image result for District Judge Andrew Hanen
District Judge Andrew Hanen

Appointed by: George W. Bush

13 posted on 08/31/2018 1:51:38 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Don’t ask, just do it.

Let the judge enforce his perfidy.


14 posted on 08/31/2018 2:10:52 PM PDT by castlebrew (Gun Control means hitting where you're aiming!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

Hate to say it, by my state, Texas, BLEW IT!

If DACA is ILLEGAL, UNCONSTITUTIONAL, or whatever, which it is, then why suspend our lawsuit against it, just because we get a President who is willing to cut a deal to ‘fix it’?

Or do we only carry through with our suits when it’s a DEMOCRAT President?

Hopefully we LEARN SOMETHING from this - either we (i.e., Texas) agree that DACA is JUST FINE and TOTALLY LEGAL, or we do not - and if we do not, why should our lawsuit be based on who’s in the White House?


15 posted on 08/31/2018 2:19:14 PM PDT by BobL (I drive a pick up truck because it makes me feel like a man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
Hanen is actually the very constitutional, conservative judge who found Obama's autocratic "pen and phone" deferral actions to be illegal and unconstitutional during that administration.

It's a pretty good bet that he's executing this properly and objectively.

16 posted on 08/31/2018 2:42:52 PM PDT by fwdude (History has no 'sides;' you're thinking of geometry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

This DACA caca could have been squashed before it got started but the GOP refused to sue to stop it.

DACA has no legal basis.

Much like the Kenyanesian Usurper who made it up out of thin air.


20 posted on 08/31/2018 3:21:32 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents__Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
He's just being a judge. They LOVE to say "no" based on technicalities. What he meant was that the states' delays in seeking this relief had induced too many people to materially change their positions in reliance on DACA for him to decide this case based on the sketchy factual record created by the injunction request. So there will be a trial at which he will likely find DACA illegal. And don't hold your breath waiting for him to change his mind, because he won't. DACA is a goner as far as he is concerned.

I saw rulings like this a lot during the 40 years I practiced law.

21 posted on 08/31/2018 4:59:11 PM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen
“The Court did not grant the preliminary injunction as it found that the States had delayed seeking this relief for years, that the balance of private interests fell in favor of the denial of the requested relief, and that implementing the relief at this point in time was contrary to the best interests of the public,” District Judge Andrew Hanen ruled.

Admittedly, I have not read the actual decision but from the above quote, it doesn't appear that this was a final decision on the case itself, but simply denial of the request to suspend the program while the case is in progress. He did indicate that he believed that the state would win when the trial is actually held. If I am correct in my reading, it is not a bad decision at all.

22 posted on 08/31/2018 6:50:33 PM PDT by etcb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yesthatjallen

So SICK of these tin-pot dictators, these district judges, who think they have the power to enforce non-laws. WHEN WILL WE HAVE JUSTICE? When will judges rule FOR AMERICANS instead of MS-13?


23 posted on 08/31/2018 7:02:28 PM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Enjoy the decline of the American empire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson