Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California lawmakers bump gun age to 21, ban gun show, enact long arm rationing
Guns.com ^ | 08/31/18 | Chris Egar

Posted on 08/31/2018 8:42:21 AM PDT by Simon Green

A series of four anti-gun bills were approved late this week and are heading to Gov. Jerry Brown for signature. The measures — Assembly Bill 2888 and Senate Bills 221, 1100, and 1177 — passed the state legislature and now head to the state’s Democratic governor for further consideration.

AB 2888 would expand who can file for one of California’s Gun Violence Restraining Orders, adding coworkers, employers, and school employees to the list that currently includes family members and police. Such orders, largely pioneered by the state, have been derided as “turn in your neighbor” laws as they allow for temporary gun seizures with the accused only able to appear in court after the fact in many cases. After making it through the Assembly on a 48-25 vote in May, the Senate approved it this week 25-12.

The second measure, SB 221, would prohibit the sale of firearms and ammunition at the state-owned Cow Palace in Daly City. The historic venue has long been the location of numerous gun shows throughout the years, which has drawn the ire of Democrats from nearby San Francisco, a city that regulated its last gun shop out of business in 2015. The bill passed the Assembly in a contentious 44-31 vote before navigating the Senate Thursday, 26-13.

“Our country is awash in guns, and schoolchildren are dying,” said the bill’s sponsor, state Sen. Scott Wiener D-San Francisco. “We need fewer guns, and we need to stop the proliferation of guns whose only purpose is to kill as many people as possible as quickly as possible.”

Also headed to Brown is Sen. Anthony Portantino’s SB 1100 that would bar firearm sales to those under 21 years of age. The move would be similar to laws passed in Florida and Vermont this year, both of which have triggered a legal challenge. A fiscal analysis of the measure estimates California would lose out on $2.2 million per year in mandatory dealer fees due to the decreased number of gun sales resulting from the proposed new laws. Nonetheless, the Assembly approved it 47-30 on Tuesday setting up a 26-12 Senate concurrence on Wednesday.

“I am determined to help California respond appropriately to the tragic events our country has recently faced,” the Los Angeles County Dem said Friday. “I feel it is imperative that California leads when Washington refuses to act.”

Another of Portantino’s proposals, SB 1177, aims to ration all firearm purchases to one every 30 days. The state currently has such a rule for handgun sales, which the proposal would stretch to include shotguns and rifles. Just the District of Columbia, Maryland, and New Jersey have gun rationing laws on the books, but they, like California’s current statute, are directed at handguns only. The measure was given a 47-30 nod in the Assembly earlier this week before a 25-12 vote in the Senate on Thursday.

The move this week grows the stack of gun control expansions on Brown’s desk to eight, following just days after legislators forwarded him a quartet of bills to expand lifetime gun bans and make it harder to get a concealed carry permit. He has until Sept. 30 to sign or veto the bills.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California; US: District of Columbia; US: Florida; US: Maryland; US: New Jersey; US: Vermont
KEYWORDS: 2018election; 2020election; 2ndamendment; ab2888; anthonyportantino; banglist; california; cowpalace; dalycity; districtofcolumbia; election2018; election2020; florida; governormoonbeam; inandoutburger; jerrybrown; losangelescounty; maryland; newjersey; nra; sanfrancisco; sb1100; sb1177; sb221; scottwiener; secondamendment; vermont
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 08/31/2018 8:42:21 AM PDT by Simon Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Simon Green

Hmmm. So automatically you’re less likely to go whack-a-doodle when you hit 21 or something? Them cali law makers shur r smart huh?


2 posted on 08/31/2018 8:45:19 AM PDT by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green

Why are they rationing guns? Are they in short supply?


3 posted on 08/31/2018 8:45:19 AM PDT by smokingfrog ( sleep with one eye open (<o> ---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green

I’m sure that will stop the criminals in their tracks!......................as they pour across the border into El Norte!..............


4 posted on 08/31/2018 8:46:23 AM PDT by Red Badger (July 2018 - the month the world learns the TRUTH......Q Anon.......Timelines change. Aug 16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green

What promises are being made if this is enacted? Liberals are never made to explain themselves before they pass “common sense” gun control laws and after. No accountability.


5 posted on 08/31/2018 8:46:55 AM PDT by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green

California REALLY needs to be three separate states.


6 posted on 08/31/2018 8:47:10 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.tand http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green

I’d rather see the voting age bumped back to 21


7 posted on 08/31/2018 8:47:27 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smokingfrog

They sure hope so.


8 posted on 08/31/2018 8:48:30 AM PDT by ConjunctionJunction
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Not three. Two. These two:


9 posted on 08/31/2018 8:49:44 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Fraudulently documented foreigners are exempt from laws in CA.
These laws are only for law-abiding US citizens.


10 posted on 08/31/2018 8:50:13 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents__Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I like that map.


11 posted on 08/31/2018 8:51:26 AM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here of Citizen Parents__Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

AZTLAN.

It’s here......................


12 posted on 08/31/2018 8:53:40 AM PDT by Red Badger (July 2018 - the month the world learns the TRUTH......Q Anon.......Timelines change. Aug 16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green

I see the porcupine with a balloon.

The inevitable legal challenges might get stuck at the 9th circus but it they will ABSOLUTELY be upheld in SCOTUS.

California continues to think it is not subject to the Constitution, except when it is convenient.


13 posted on 08/31/2018 8:55:31 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (As always IMHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

is the ballot measure moving forward?


14 posted on 08/31/2018 8:56:25 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.tand http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green; vette6387; Sarah Barracuda; bitt; unkus; Foolsgold; NFHale

Conservatives in California have got to defeat the Marxist who are destroying the State of California out of the Governor’s office and Assembly in Sacramento. Jerry Brown and his cabal of Marxist are truly insane, IMO.


15 posted on 08/31/2018 8:57:08 AM PDT by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Three separate Democratic-majority states? No way. The guy pushing this was scamming people. That whole effort was DOA. No way with the maps drawn that you’d ever get anything but 6 Democratic Senators. Besides, breaking up the state needs local, state, and national approval. Again, DOA.


16 posted on 08/31/2018 8:57:53 AM PDT by Reno89519 (No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green
If it weren't for guns, Mollie Tibbitts would still be alive.

Wait..

17 posted on 08/31/2018 8:59:35 AM PDT by CivilWarBrewing (Get off my back for my usage of CAPS, especially you snowflake males! MAN UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Simon Green

The age limit provision is unconstitutional as it violates the equal protection clause. However, if the state wants to move the age of majority to 21, then I would agree with the restriction.


18 posted on 08/31/2018 9:01:52 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

I’d love to see mushroom clouds go up along the Cali coast.


19 posted on 08/31/2018 9:05:45 AM PDT by SWAMP-C1PHER (HOMO, OECONOMIA, ET CIVITAS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

“California REALLY needs to be three separate states.”

With two senator total for the three. Maybe just making it a territory would be better.


20 posted on 08/31/2018 9:14:51 AM PDT by Dennis M.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson