Posted on 08/31/2018 5:55:46 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
Correct comrade.
Seven years to get this information? Seven years? That's pretty damning.
This story could get interesting.
In the article ‘bests interests’ is their stated reason for supressing it
remember the ozone hole, I was watching it from nasa sats, it was closing before they decided to change propellants, any bets someone got really rich on providing the alternative...planned that way of course
Even worse, you can make the data up as you go. That happens too.
The erasure was an accident, I tell ya!
.
>> “If ‘the science is settled’ why don’t they want the public to see how the science is done?” <<
It has “settled” to the mud at the bottom of that sewer.
.
Yeah, that would be a next level.
You don;t even need to do any actual work for that thought.
You just sit home and watch TV and make things up in your head.
I was thinking more of actual scientific malpractice. Where work is actually done, good data is collected, and then some one deletes it because they don’t like the results. You can never get original data back again.
You can make it all up, though, sure.
What the heck ever happened to show your work? To peer review? This global warming scam is anything BUT science if the warmists results can’t be replicated and verified.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.