[tinyowl]

One thing I love about the race incident hoaxes is that when you have to figure out most ratios in life it's almost never nice round numbers of events and different outcomes so you have do things like dividing 176 into 63. Very tedious and way to complex for us stupid Trump voters. For example we can use computers to make at-risk groups feel lesser-than and unsafe but certainly we can't use computers for math.

With the race hoaxes the division to get the ratio of hoax to real incident only involves dividing a number into itself and the answer to that is always 1.

This also means if there is a race incident being spread by the media you don't have to think 'oh well let's see there is a 45.6543 percent chance this one really happened.'

You can just read about the incident the day it's reported and then take your handy predictive 1.0 that results from dividing a number into itself and say 'it's a hoax.' You don't even have to say 'well there's a good or even very good chance it's a hoax.'

It's like a racio rather than a ratio.

[Spacetrucker]

You put some deep thought into that post ... there’s a future in speech-writing for you :-D