Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: madison10

I think that pulling all of their clearances would not go well over politically. I think a better approach would be, via executive order, place all the X-employees or office holders in a “not need to know” category. They could be re-instated on a case by case basis if necessary.

They would keep the clearance but it would make it a very serious offense for anyone to share information with them. If after the 5 year renewal period they still didn’t have a need to know, then let their SC lapse.


10 posted on 08/19/2018 11:44:47 AM PDT by babygene (hMake America Great Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: babygene

5 years to get rid of them? I don’t agree. The bureaucracy badly needs trimming. The day they are terminated or retire they should lose their clearances as would happen in any business. Just plain COMMON SENSE!


25 posted on 08/19/2018 12:09:06 PM PDT by Mollypitcher1 (I have not yet begun to fight....John Paul Jones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: babygene

These azz hats use their security clearance to secure lucrative employment and contracts.


26 posted on 08/19/2018 12:09:17 PM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://youtu.be/wH-pk2vZGw2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson