[Dilbert San Diego]

That’s what I thought too.

It’s frustrating that Facebook, Twitter etc apparently are censoring conservative thoughts and ideas.

But, I also wondered why Prager or anyone else, can’t “broadcast” if that’s the right terminology, in a different manner, from different sites, and bypass the gatekeepers of Facebook.

I’m.not a techie so don’t know all the ins and outs. But it seems like a good idea to go around Facebook censorship.

[Theoria]

They are freeloading. They don't have to put in the resources to create a company like fb or twitter. They could try. But as of now, they and many others have been content to stay on youtube and such and use its resources.

[semimojo]

But, I also wondered why Prager or anyone else, can’t “broadcast” if that’s the right terminology, in a different manner, from different sites, and bypass the gatekeepers of Facebook.

They can and do - just go to prageru.com.

So does Alex Jones and everyone else whining about censorship.

This whole thing isn’t about free speech, it’s about people being able to make a lot more money if they have the free sites Facebook and Twitter carry their stuff.

They don’t want free speech - they have it.

They want to force private businesses to broadcast that speech whether the business agrees with it or not.