You can “claim” whatever you want, but Protestantism clearly is not Catholic as defined by Trent. You are in heresy.
“but Protestantism clearly is not Catholic as defined by Trent. You are in heresy.”
Thank God!
It is Biblical and that is more than sufficient.
You can “claim” whatever you want, but Protestantism clearly is not Catholic as defined by Trent. You are in heresy.
***
Oh boo hoo hoo, the Roman follower doesn’t like it when we take back the words that should never have belonged to the Vatican in the first place.
Let me play the world’s second saddest tune on the world’s second smallest violin.
Ditto. It is faithfulness to the doctrines that were supported by Holy Scripture that determined what was of the "catholic" faith. Roman Catholicism has added and changed many doctrines that are NOT found in Scripture and even some that were at one time viewed as heresy but are accepted now. Rome asserts she doesn't need the testimony of antiquity and has the authority to declare whatever she decides and to hold all Christendom to obey her. The "Apostolic" handing down of teaching no longer matters. For that reason alone, Roman Catholicism is NOT catholic no matter what Trent defines. I know whom I have believed, and I am convinced that He is able to guard what I have entrusted to Him for that day.
You can “claim” whatever you want, but Catholicism and Trent clearly is not the NT church as defined by the the only wholly inspired, substantive and authoritative record of what the NT church believed (including how they understood the OT and gospels), which is Scripture, especially Acts thru Revelation.
You and your self-proclaimed one true infallible church are in heresy based on comparison with that only infallible source .