Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tenacious 1; aMorePerfectUnion; boatbums; ealgeone; Luircin; Mark17; Elsie
That's the way I read it too. Except, he seemed to be saying that this is NOT pedophilia, it's ONLY homosexuality because the boys are past the start of puberty? That gets sketchy. Priests don't tend to have consistent, unsupervised access to boys until they are about 12 years old (alter boys, servers, bible studies, CCD classes, etc.). Further, the article seems to suggest that one is worse than the other, as if there is a different level of consent. It's RAPE either way you cut it. And it should be punished as harshly.

If the problem were *just* homoseuxality, then they wouldn't be going after younger boys. They'd be keeping it among themselves where they'd have willing, compliant partners who would be happy to keep their mouths shut and not risk getting caught.

The fact that they went after young teenaged boys indicates that the problem IS pedophilia.

And I agree with you that very likely the only reason they didn't have more kids under 12 is access.

Because in all honesty, a 12 year old can still be pretty much NOT sexually mature. Twelve is just the beginning of that phase in a child's life and while some kids have reached sexual maturity at that age, a great many have not but still more closely resemble children, not men.

That whole argument is just an attempt to downplay the seriousness of the issue by making it look not so bad.

IOW, damage control.

164 posted on 08/18/2018 11:07:09 PM PDT by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: metmom; Tenacious 1; aMorePerfectUnion; ealgeone; Luircin; Mark17; Elsie
That whole argument is just an attempt to downplay the seriousness of the issue by making it look not so bad. IOW, damage control.

Since we know that this is NOT a new problem in the Roman Catholic church, do you think that perhaps the reason it is being exposed now is to teach Christians that they cannot depend upon "their" church to save them but that it is only in Jesus Christ that we trust? It's obvious to me (a former RC) that human institutions will ALWAYS be fragile and fail us and that is why the TRUE church of Christ is that Spiritual House St. Peter spoke about and of which all believers are living stones that build it up. My faith is in Jesus, not a church.

270 posted on 08/21/2018 1:31:11 PM PDT by boatbums (Not by works of righteousness which we have done but according to His mercy he saved us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson