That's backwards. If you are NOT morally convinced the defendant did the crime, you must acquit.
>>”You are morally convinced the defendant did NOT do the crime, you must acquit.”
That’s backwards. If you are NOT morally convinced the defendant did the crime, you must acquit.<<
Hmmm.. I have to ponder that one. My immediate reaction is you are correct as it is the presumption of innocence. I phrased mine to comport with “what is reasonable doubt” as opposed to “what is presumption of innocence.”
Splitting some hairs but I think I answered the question more directly while you addressed the issue more completely.
A always IMHO. Which I decided is my new tag.