Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain

The second amendment does not exclude convicted felons. If the state thinks a criminal too evil then give the felon life or execute him. If the state says a felon has served their time…then the second amendment should apply to him as it does everyone else.


4 posted on 08/16/2018 4:50:23 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Vaquero
This brings up a debate I've been having with myself and I honestly don't know which way to go on it.

On one hand, you could look at it as a person is convicted of a crime (felony), does their time, and then is released. As the saying goes, they "paid their debt to society" for their actions. In that light, why wouldn't they be allowed to possess a firearm?

On the other hand, if losing your freedom temporarily (being incarcerated) is part of "paying your debt to society" why couldn't losing your right to possess a firearm (permanently) also be considered part of paying that debt?

Every once in a while I pull this issue out and think about it - but it doesn't keep me up at night.

8 posted on 08/16/2018 5:23:12 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps ( Be ready!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson