I do. If you're gonna start a fracas that ends in pushing and shoving, you ought to be man enough to respond in kind; not with a gun.
The fracas started the moment the guy committed Assault and Battery.
The Baby Mama got the ball rolling. What a waste of Life.
There was enough Stupitidy to go around. What if the guy who was shoved to the ground had hit his head on the pavement and died?
Not defending the Shooter, but I wasnt the guy who was Physically Assaulted either. The Authorities made the ultimate decision.
This isn't the school playground. This guy was violently assaulted and could have easily been killed by the attacker.
My feeling is he could have held his fire but the way the law reads I think he was justified in the shooting as he easily could have still believed his life was in danger.
The moral to this story is if you escalate a situation into a violent attack you may well get killed in response. The attacker should have kept his hands to himself said his peace to the other guy if he wanted and got in his car a left. If he did he would be alive today but he choose to commit a violent assault and ended up losing his life.
If I were on the jury, the shooter walks. I don't exactly think he had to fire but he was certainly justified in doing so.