Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaBear3625
The official "press" is not a privileged group. It has no more rights than any other private group.

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution begs to differ.
12 posted on 08/13/2018 10:33:22 AM PDT by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: drjimmy
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution begs to differ.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; "

At the time this was written, there was no class of professional, full-time reporters referring to themselves as "the press". In this context, "freedom of the press" is freedom to disseminate your opinions via the written word, like you and I are doing now. In the 18th century, it was common for people to hire a printer to make pamphlets for distribution. See the history of the "Federalist Papers".

"Freedom of the press" applies to ALL Americans, not just full-time professional journalists.

13 posted on 08/13/2018 11:42:23 AM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It rubs the rainbow on it's skin or it gets the diversity again!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson