So it's OK for the social media companies and tech giants to conspire to remove his presence from the highest traffic driving websites in the world because Jones had such a large following anyway?
Other people aren't so lucky. And it won't be long now till Jones has his apps banned off of cell phones as well.
Who will compel a social media company to carry him?
Is there any justice in a power to compel a media company to carry content with an editorial bias they do not agree with?
Do you want some government agency to have that power?
Yes, it’s OK.
The people who developed and marketed those web sites did so with their own initiative and money.
What’s the principle that says they lose their private property rights when they become popular?