[Behind the Blue Wall]

I haven’t seen anyone define exactly what’s “hateful” about Infowars.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

I haven’t seen anyone define exactly what’s “hateful” about Infowars.

The gaslight press says he's hateful, so it must be true.

[DiogenesLamp]

I haven’t seen anyone define exactly what’s “hateful” about Infowars.

I haven't either. All i've seen so far is a mob screaming "BURN THE WITCH!"

[SE Mom]

They’ve created a massive problem for themselves. Hate speech is, so far, undefined, legally. And we see every day on Twitter just how arbitrary the choice is about its meaning. I’m surprised the legal teams of these platforms didn’t cite Jones libelous statements about Sandy Hook etc.instead of “hate speech”. UNLESS they want a legal battle to define such speech. Hard to believe it’s come to this. I can’t stand Jones, but what’s been done to him is immoral and wrong.

[Rennes Templar]

Classifying Jones site as hate speech means they are getting really uncomfortable with all that Trump is doing, and Jones is getting close to exposing some serious deep state shiite.

[frank ballenger]

I said again and again on FR, this is not a free country.

WE do not have freedom of speech.

Dems skate, but conservatives have to obey all laws or go to prison.

I never contributed a nickel to Alex Jones or his products but I fully believe in his rights and explore the vicious acts of the Left.

[editor-surveyor]

.
Speaking the truth about anything is now HATE!
.