It’s the difference between having a Kenyanesian Usurper that the Constitution says can’t be President and is therefore not bound by it and having a legitimate President who abides by the Constitution and the rules.
This part is true....
and having a legitimate President who abides by the Constitution and the rules.
.... but this part ignores the role of the Federal Judges who routinely rule in opposition to *actual language* in various pieces of legislation.
It is not that they don't understand the language, it is that they are at war with it.