[ScottinVA]

That one at #1677 is a screenshot of an ABC News video that’s on YouTube. I don’t who thinks “trolls” are trying to discredit it, but the detail “Q,” or whatever he is, forgot to alter is the detail in the windows. You’ll see by comparing the image on Q’s site and the opening image on this video.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=NvyCqgrzOYc

Of course you’re going to summarily dismiss it, but your guy might want to do a better job covering his tracks.

[ScottinVA]

*I don’t care who thinks “trolls”...

[edzo4]

I'll forgive your ignorance in not understanding how it works and how to recognize the difference between what Q has posted VS what Q pulls from the discussion board from an anon and comments or adds to it

So Try and follow along

1677 is not a picture Q posted

1677 is the same picture from ABC from the internet that the anon took off the internet and super imposed the actual Q image which was post 1675 on top of it to demonstrate where the image came from. All of the other images in Q post 1677 are from the internet and people working out where the picture came from

THIS IS THE IMAGE Q POSTED

The only other thing in Q post 1677 that is attributed to Q is this text. which explains why there is an apple logo in the image and why the image is reversed because it was the reflection off the back of the iphone Trump tweets with.

Who would have thought the 'Twitter' phone could be so useful.
Do 'reflections' violate NAT SEC rules?
Where must one be located in order to obtain a reflection on the back of a phone of that image?
Image provided here has been distorted (stretched).
Q