Thank God you are judging. Pun intended.
I am not judging. I just think dynastic politics is not about “public service”. It is more like treating politics as a “family business”, which is what it was and has been for the Kennedy’s, Bushes, Cuomos, Browns and Clintons.
As far as Trump and his personal mistakes go, many are publicly well known, and where that places him morally I leave to G-d, as THAT is not for me to judge. Yet, the record is there and I think his son could have some of the same inclination that led to some of his father’s personal mistakes. That is not so much a judgement as an observation.
As far as Ms Guilfyle, you can call it a judgement, but again it is an observation from the only evidence I have - what is publcly known and has been publicly observed. And, yes, that is the same observational perspective used to size up anyone we are not personally involved in. Yes, that perspective could be made by the images she has presented or has been persented of her, while “inside” she’s maybe a very different person. Personally, I wouldn’t bet on it.