Why would that deal a blow to Mueller’s probe (unless the five are all deep-state Democrats who are guilty of crimes under Obama?)
Mueller’s Witnesses
- James Comey
- Tsar Nicholas II
- Barbara Streisand
- Stormy Daniels
- Some guy named Chuck who sat next to Manafort in 3rd grade.
What a coincidence, more DEMOCRATS getting immunity.
Look for all of them to get it once the full extent of the fraudulent FISA warrants are revealed.
John 3:20 - "Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed."
Mueller has an awful litigious track record. He really is that dumb.
Immunity is a double edge sword.
Once granted immunity they can not later fall back on the 5th amendment. So if put on the witness stand and asked questions they can not not refuse to answer nor will they be able to play the “I can not remember card”.
Do these people really want immunity?
Honestly now, when was the last time you saw a MSM outlet identify "a Barack Obama appointee?"
Well now. We’ve been hearing for a week now “unnamed sources” telling us that one or both of the Podesta Brothers would be granted immunity.
Now we shall see.
All 5 still on Hillary’s Payroll ?
Hmm...secret testimony, secret surveillance, secret witnesses, sealed indictments, and people in solitary confinement without a trial - all this brought to you by the Party of Transparency. I can hardly wait to see what comes next.
I think the constitution is quite clear on this one. You get to face your accusers. If they let the government bring in secret people to testify then whats the difference between our government and Putin’s.
So I get to see Tony Podesta conspire with Mueller to convict his business partner of crimes they both committed?
That’s lower than whale sh!t.
5.56mm
I revel in his migraine.
As I have said many times, this is not an investigation, it is a massive cover up!
Mueller didn’t want the names of the Democrat Deep State criminals released to the public, because the public will be able to easily tell this is a cover up, when all these immunity deals start flying left and right!!
When will some judge put an end to this farce?
There is no "undue harassment" clause in the Constitution.
A defendant has the right to confront his accusers in a public trial.
-PJ
I hope that any immunity granted is extremely specific and limited in nature and scope. No blanket immunity crap.
Memorandum in support of Motion to Seal Motion the Government’s Motions for Use Immunity for Trial Testimony
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vgTt4-KNPTNm3J9lVimQHHJjOR2cyDBN/view
These five witnesses have asserted their 5th Amendment rights against self-incrimination with Mueller. In other words, they refuse to testify without immunity. So, Mueller knows they have committed crimes, likely similar and worse than anything Manafort has done. Why aren’t they being prosecuted?
Even with immunity, there are plenty of perjury traps for these witnesses. My guess it that if this case goes to trial, they will at some point assert their 5th Amendment right against self incrimination. That will force the judge to dismiss the charges.
It could be that the Judge granted immunity for the witnesses in order to force Mueller to dismiss the charges.
I think the “Not this s*** again!” guy has been replaced. LOL