Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevin in California
"He says even if some parts were “improper”, the overall FISA warrant was not illegal."

Sorry Brit. They relied on the fake dossier as prime evidence for the request. People holding official government positions signed an affidavit declaring that they had reviewed and verified the dossier information included in the FISA application. The use of the dossier itself was improper because the FBI didn't verify it, but claimed they did. Therefore, the FISA warrant request was illegal. Not to mention the fact that they never divulged to the Judges the fact that a foreign agent had created the dossier, paid for by Hillary's campaign.

46 posted on 07/22/2018 5:43:21 PM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mass55th

It is one thing where they signed an affidavit as having reviewed and verified the information contained therein, but didn’t really didn’t review and/or verify.

It is another thing where they signed an affidavit knowing that information therein was false, or could reasonably be false.

With the number of signatures on the FISA application, it is possible that some signers belonged to former and some belonged to the latter. The latter are the ones that need to be identified and legal action taken against.


78 posted on 07/22/2018 7:29:13 PM PDT by Susquehanna Patriot (Do Leftist/Liberals Really Believe That Dissent = Highest Form of Patriotism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson