I agree with you.
Everyone seems to want to get in on the act these days too.
Obama keeps going abroad as if he sets our policies.
It’s time to warn these folks or take legal action against them for trying to conduct U. S. foreign policy.
“climate change” comes up in the first paragraph - no surprise.
here’s globalist Patrick in 2015:
4 Dec 2015: CFR: Stewart Patrick: Combating Climate Change Beyond Paris
The UN climate talks in Paris are just one part of the international climate policy regime, write Stewart Patrick, director of the Program on International Institutions and Global Governance, and Research Associate Naomi Egel. In this post, part of our ongoing guest series on the Paris summit, they note other institutions contributing to the climate policy process and highlight several climate policy options from CFR’s Global Governance Monitor...
More effective alternatives to the intergovernmental system include the Climate and Clean Air Coalition, a private-public partnership designed to curb short-lived pollutants and their associated health risks, and the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group (Michael Bloomberg)...
Climate change is also increasingly addressed by a host of other international organizations whose mandates have evolved to include this challenge. Within the UN system alone, some twenty agencies work on this issue through their own specific lens, including the United Nations Environment Program, the Global Environment Facility, and the United Nations Development Program. Additionally, the World Bank has incorporated financing for mitigation and adaptation projects into its activities: at present, 21 percent of the Bank’s funding is climate related, totaling $10.3 billion a year. And in October 2015, the Bank pledged to increase its climate financing to up to $29 billion annually by 2020.
https://www.cfr.org/blog/stewart-patrick-combating-climate-change-beyond-paris
and that’s not all of the entities listed in the article.
Foreign Relations Law: An Overview. ... The states are not sovereign “states” under international law, since the Constitution does not vest them with a capacity to conduct foreign relations. They are specifically prohibited from entering into any treaty, alliance, or confederation (see Article 1, § 10).