To: SeekAndFind
They can try but I doubt it.
2 posted on
07/18/2018 12:32:26 PM PDT by
EQAndyBuzz
(Proud member of the DWN party. (Deplorable Wing Nut))
To: EQAndyBuzz
No they can’t and they know it
It’s solely to keep their nauseous narrative in the forefront
9 posted on
07/18/2018 12:34:37 PM PDT by
A_Former_Democrat
("Moderates/Independents/Non-voters" Are DIMS REALLY who you'd want BACK in POWER?)
To: EQAndyBuzz
If the Dems can get the Rinos to agree to issue a subpoena, it will be a piece of cake to find a willing judge to enforce it.
16 posted on
07/18/2018 12:36:09 PM PDT by
damper99
To: EQAndyBuzz
Seems like a pretty cut-and-dried separation of powers issue to me.
To: EQAndyBuzz
This is insane. If it were allowed, no foreign leader would ever consent to a “private” consultation with a US president. That is disaster.
42 posted on
07/18/2018 1:08:18 PM PDT by
djpg
To: EQAndyBuzz
They actually used only one interpreter. Putin’s. Then he had him killed after the meeting. Try that one.
65 posted on
07/18/2018 3:16:27 PM PDT by
Oldexpat
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson