Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fso301
Why in all my years did I never hear that term until about 12 months ago?

It's a clever bit of propaganda that was thrown out recently and has gone pretty much unchallenged. The real definition of a white nationalist is someone who believes in a white nation, just as the definition of a black nationalist is somebody who believes in a black nation - Louis Farrakhan, for example. These are racial separatists but not necessarily supremacists.

However, anyone who is white and believes in their nation, i.e. America, is not a white nationalist despite being both white and a nationalist; nor is anyone who is black and believes in America a black nationalist. The term isn't additive, it has a separate meaning. Blurring that distinction has been an effective political smear, nothing more.

58 posted on 07/07/2018 5:37:41 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Billthedrill
However, anyone who is white and believes in their nation, i.e. America, is not a white nationalist despite being both white and a nationalist.... Blurring that distinction has been an effective political smear, nothing more.

What do you expect from people who don't know what bathroom to use?

/s

70 posted on 07/08/2018 4:44:27 PM PDT by Albion Wilde ("There is no grievance that is a fit object of redress by mob law." --Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson