The loony left is using this case to justify what the skank at the Red Hen did to Sarah Sanders. Apples and hammers. Mr. Phillips never denied them entry into his shop or even access to his goods. What he said was that he was not going to use his artistic talents to commemorate a ceremony that violated his beliefs. The apt analogy to the Red Hen incident might be if one waiter did not want to serve Sarah so the owner had to find another.
The owners of the Red Hen should be allowed to patronize who they want. In a way they’re exercising their right to free expression. This is the beauty of the 1A. It allows us to recognize the fools amongst us. A gov’t entity attempted to compel a Chrisian bakery to go against their deeply held beliefs. As far as the Red Hen their rights do not shield them from the negative consequences of their actions. No litigation necessary, let the court of public opinion speak for itself.
Well, they’re now saying one doesn’t have to serve someone you disagree with for any reason. Now, I believe the Demoncrats were against the equal amendment.