Myths and Madness: The No-See-Ums of Spygate, Russiagate, and Watergate, Part 1

Chalet Reports ^ | 19 June 2018 | Ashton Gray

[LevonRiver]

If I asked you to bring me a single feathered egg of a unicorn, and I offered to buy it at any price you name, you couldn’t do it. You also likely would consider me mad—and with reason.

If I asked you to bring me a single page of written notes from the illegal wiretapping of Watergate telephone conversations, and I offered to buy it at any price you name, you couldn’t do that, either.

That’s because the wiretapping notes, or “logs,” that you were told about—over and over and over and over, by CIA mouthpieces at The Washington Post, at the New York Times, in federal courts, in movies, in books, in TV shows, and in Congressional hearings—do not exist now, and never existed at all.

[LevonRiver]

Myths and Madness: The No-See-Ums of Spygate, Russiagate, and Watergate, Part 1

Staggering analysis of CIA, DOJ, FBI coverups, in two parts.

[Paladin2]

Disconnected linkage for me....

[arthurus]

Right sight. Wrong article.

[arthurus]

how about right site?

[Colinsky]

A site for soar ayes.

[lizma2]

http://www.chaletbooks.com/chaletreports/?p=1246

[Widget Jr]

Read the article past the excerpt. He's using current events to promote "Watergate, The hoax" by Ashton Gray (pseudonym) which is a Scientology conspiracy theory over Watergate. This is the second time Leon's linked to Chalet Reports to promote the book this way.

[mrsmel]

You mean, a site four soar ayes :)

[Bratch]

Re:Watergate.

It wasn’t the crime, it was the cover-up.

[palmer]

Excerpts:

That’s why it is of utmost, even urgent, importance to find out what Sally Harmony saw.

No, it is not. Sally Harmony never saw them.

To finally learn the truth about what Sally Harmony saw, we must venture once more into the labyrinthine mind of G. Gordon Liddy himself. Only Liddy can tell it; it is, after all, his tale

And now we finally know the answer: Sally Harmony never saw anything at all.

The surreal landscape of Watergate—and of Spygate, and of Russiagate, and of Dossiergate, and of FISAgate—is crawling with no-see-ums. It is dense with no-see-ums. It is practically a landfill of no-see-ums. The creation of these vicious and virulent vacuums and visions is art, not accident. Such nonexistent “things” and “events” are the stock-in-trade of the so-called “intelligence community.” The Deep State invests untold billions in creating these manufactured hallucinations and pawning them off, through their controlled “media,” on a gullible and unquestioning world.

Yet they were a HOAX. They were a MYTH. They were a LIE, manufactured with malice aforethought by the Central Intelligence Agency—the single largest criminal organization in the history of mankind—and its equally criminal FBI and Five Eyes accomplices.

Do you still doubt it? Read now: Myths and Madness: The No-See-Ums of Spygate, Russiagate, and Watergate, Part 2

And now:

[Colinsky]

You mean, a site four soar ayes :)

Yes, of course, how could I have been so wrong.

[MHGinTN]

This must be a hugh and series posting ... a bunny with a waffle! Not a pancake, A WAFFLE!

[GOPJ]

Link doesn’t work.

[LevonRiver]

Doh! Yep, I really screwed up. Here is the correct link:

http://www.chaletbooks.com/chaletreports/?p=1246

[LevonRiver]

Very sorry. Here is correct article:

http://www.chaletbooks.com/chaletreports/?p=1246

[LevonRiver]

Sorry. Here you go:

http://www.chaletbooks.com/chaletreports/?p=1246

[LevonRiver]

I am in awe of your amazing research powers, Widget Jr, given that you are the only person in the entire world who can find the word “Scientology” anywhere in that article.

Obsess much?

[LevonRiver]

Apologies for my boneheaded goof. Here is right link:

http://www.chaletbooks.com/chaletreports/?p=1246

[GOPJ]

On the positive side YOU posted an article people WANTED to follow to the jump... That almost trumps the mistaken link...

:)

Thanks for the correction Levon...

[GOPJ]

http://www.chaletbooks.com/chaletreports/?p=1184
If there’s a ping list - add me... interesting take...

On 15 August 2016, FBI agent Peter Strzok sent a text message to his girlfriend, FBI lawyer Lisa Page, that said:

“I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s (Andrew McCabe, Deputy Director of the FBI) office that there’s no way Trump gets elected—but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40 … “

Who or what was “like an insurance policy”? There’s only one logical answer: It was their old crony-in-crime and one-time boss, former FBI Director Robert Mueller.

There has been speculation that the “insurance policy” statement alluded somehow to the entire “Russian collusion” theme that was developed using the two-faced agents provocateur (Carter Page, Stefan Halper, et al.), leading then to the phony “pee” dossier, leading then to the criminal abuse of the FISA process. While that all was part of writing out the “insurance policy,” insurance is only as good as the insurer; indemnification is only as good as the indemnifier; a con is only as convincing as the con man; a racket is only as effective as the racketeer.

There is no “passive voice” in setting up a treacherous criminal enterprise—an “insurance policy”—to frame and overthrow a duly elected President of the United States. No matter how much work went into its creation, no matter how many clerks and low-rent spies and wormy bureaucrats laid out the “content,” no matter how many amoral thugs-in-office leaked to how many thugs-in-media, somebody had to make the “insurance policy” pay off. Treason doesn’t “just happen.” It only can happen at the hands of a person with a name and a face.

That person could not be anyone who was inside the FBI or DOJ at the time that the “insurance policy” plan was hatched. Someone would have to be brought in. He would have to have almost limitless scope, power, and budget, guarded by the pierce-proof veil of legal privilege. The only way to bring him in would be as a special counsel.

That person would have to have intimate inside knowledge of foregoing FBI and Deep-State crimes involving the Obama-Clinton-Bush cartels.

That person would have to personally know Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Andrew McCabe, James Comey, James Clapper, John Brennan, Loretta Lynch, and Rod Rosenstein.

That person would have to have enough blood on his own hands from earlier filthy deeds—e.g., Fast-and-Furious, Lois Lerner’s Tea Party targeting, Rosatom, and Benghazi—that he would have a very deep, abiding personal interest in destroying Donald Trump through any means necessary to keep the crimes buried forever.

That person would have to have interlinking codependency interests with CIA/Deep-State scum (but I repeat myself) such as James Clapper and John Brennan in the US, and MI6 in the UK.

That person would have to be fully briefed and informed, going in, on the entire set-up of the “insurance policy”—Stefan Halper, Carter Page (a classic CIA “twosie” with the name Lisa Page to add confusion), Christopher Steele, George Papadopoulos (another CIA “twosie” with Georgios Papadopoulos, one of the CIA’s other useful idiots back in 1967), the Ohrs, the fraud on the FISA court. Everything.

One person, and only one person, had the necessary résumé: Robert Mueller.

And now you know exactly why Mueller, as Special Counsel, hired Lisa Page, then returned her to the FBI and hired Peter Strzok—probably on the very same day that he sent Lisa Page back to the FBI: 13 July 2017. Now you know why Lisa Page and Peter Strzok were hired by Mueller sequentially, not at the same time—which is what some of their bought-and-paid-for liars in the media would have you believe. Now you know why Mueller muzzled his mouthpiece, Peter Carr, who refused to answer our questions about when Lisa Page went back to the FBI from the Mueller team.

The naiveté it must take to believe that Mueller just happened to pick both Strzok and Page, and simply had no idea about all they had been up to, and every single detail about the “insurance policy”— Well, you simply have to be dumber than dirt to believe for an instant that Mueller did not know the whole show, at all relevant times.

Because he did.

And before very much longer, the whole world is going to know just how deep in and dirty Mr. Insurance Policy really is.