In a world where “intent to distribute” can be established in a drug case merely by the amount of drug found in one’s possession, it strains credulity to think that they couldn’t prove intent here. I’ve yet to hear a credible argument that it would be impossible to prove intent. If anyone has one or has heard of one, I’d love to hear it.
It is another case of word parsing and excuses. No one is going to charge HRC with anything. why? Because she has all the money and the power. She is still running the DOJ and the FBI. Sessions is her Number 1 fan and protector. All the rest, including many on FR, are busy making excuses. Can’t get a Grand jury to charge. Can’t convict in DC. Everyone has full immunity. The newest is “CAN’T CHARGE HRC BECAUSE IT WILL LEAD TO OBAMA”. That has been the meme since the OIG Report. The OIG Report was a complete whitewash. Now they are having Blue Ribbon Panels and Hearings on the whitewash. Nothing will happen.